Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 8;12(1):15.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3252-3.

Population genetics of Anopheles funestus, the African malaria vector, Kenya

Affiliations

Population genetics of Anopheles funestus, the African malaria vector, Kenya

Edwin O Ogola et al. Parasit Vectors. .

Abstract

Background: Anopheles funestus is among the major malaria vectors in Kenya and sub-Saharan Africa and has been recently implicated in persistent malaria transmission. However, its ecology and genetic diversity remain poorly understood in Kenya.

Methods: Using 16 microsatellite loci, we examined the genetic structure of An. funestus sampled from 11 locations (n = 426 individuals) across a wide geographical range in Kenya spanning coastal, western and Rift Valley areas.

Results: Kenyan An. funestus resolved as three genetically distinct clusters. The largest cluster (FUN1) broadly included samples from western and Rift Valley areas of Kenya with two clusters identified from coastal Kenya (FUN2 and FUN3), not previously reported. Geographical distance had no effect on population differentiation of An. funestus. We found a significant variation in the mean Plasmodium infectivity between the clusters (χ2 = 12.1, df = 2, P = 0.002) and proportional to the malaria prevalence in the different risk zones of Kenya. Notably, there was variation in estimated effective population sizes between the clusters, suggesting possible differential impact of anti-vector interventions in represented areas.

Conclusions: Heterogeneity among Kenyan populations of An. funestus will impact malaria vector control with practical implications for the development of gene-drive technologies. The difference in Plasmodium infectivity and effective population size between the clusters could suggest potential variation in phenotypic characteristics relating to competence or insecticide resistance. This is worth examining in future studies.

Keywords: Anopheles funestus; Kenya; Malaria risk zones; Malaria vector; Microsatellites; Population genetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was acquired from the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Ethics Review Committee (Non-SSC Protocol #388 and Non-SSC Protocol #310). Sampling was done after receiving informed consent from village elders and household heads.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Map of Kenya showing the sampling locations
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Population structure of Anopheles funestus in Kenya. a Principle coordinates analysis plot based on pairwise population FST estimates showing three clusters. b Neighbor-joining tree based on the FST pairwise estimates using 16 microsatellites. c Bayesian-based structure patterns K = 3 showing separation into 3 distinct clusters. d Isolation by distance comparing genetic distance versus geographical distance based on the Mantel test. The cluster FUN1 broadly include sites from western and Rift Valley, Kenya; coastal clusters FUN2 (Fihoni, Jribuni) and FUN3 (Njoro-Taita Taveta). Site abbreviations are indicated as in Table 1

References

    1. WHO . World malaria report 2017. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
    1. National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP) Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS), and ICF International . Kenya Malaria Indicator Survey 2015. Nairobi, Kenya, and Rockville, MD, USA: NMCP, KNBS, and ICF International; 2016. p. 165.
    1. Nkumama IN, O’Meara WP, Osier FH. Changes in malaria epidemiology in Africa and new challenges for elimination. Trends Parasitol. 2017;33:128–140. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2016.11.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. President’s Malaria Initiative Kenya . Malaria Operational Plan Fy 2017. Washington: US Department of State, US Agency for International Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2017.
    1. Riehle MM, Guelbeogo WM, Gneme A, Eiglmeier K, Holm I, Bischoff E, et al. A cryptic subgroup of Anopheles gambiae is highly susceptible to human malaria parasites. Science. 2011;331:596–598. doi: 10.1126/science.1196759. - DOI - PMC - PubMed