Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 21:9:700.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00700. eCollection 2018.

A Review of Approaches to Detecting Malingering in Forensic Contexts and Promising Cognitive Load-Inducing Lie Detection Techniques

Jeffrey J Walczyk  1 , Nate Sewell  1 , Meghan B DiBenedetto  1
Affiliations
Review

A Review of Approaches to Detecting Malingering in Forensic Contexts and Promising Cognitive Load-Inducing Lie Detection Techniques

Jeffrey J Walczyk et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Malingering, the feigning of psychological or physical ailment for gain, imposes high costs on society, especially on the criminal-justice system. In this article, we review some of the costs of malingering in forensic contexts. Then the most common methods of malingering detection are reviewed, including those for feigned psychiatric and cognitive impairments. The shortcomings of each are considered. The article continues with a discussion of commonly used means for detecting deception. Although not traditionally used to uncover malingering, new, innovative methods are emphasized that attempt to induce greater cognitive load on liars than truth tellers, some informed by theoretical accounts of deception. As a type of deception, we argue that such cognitive approaches and theoretical understanding can be adapted to the detection of malingering to supplement existing methods.

Keywords: cognitive malingering detection; forensic psychiatry; inducing cognitive load; malingering detection techniques; theory of mind.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Sartori G, Orrù G, Zangrossi A. Detection of malingering in personal injury and damage ascertainment. In: Ferrara S, Boscolo-Berto R, Viel G. editors. Personal Injury and Damage Ascertainment under Civil Law. Cham: Springer; (2016).
    1. Sartori G, Zangrossi A, Orrù G, Monaro M. Detection of malingering in psychic damage ascertainment. In: Ferrara SD. editor. P5 Medicine and Justice. Cham: Springer; (2017). p. 330–341.
    1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; (2013).
    1. McCaffrey RJ, Weber M. A clinical approach to evaluating malingering in forensic neuropsychological evaluations. Span J Neuropsychol. (2000) 2:21–36.
    1. Resnick PJ, Knoll JL. Malingered psychosis. In: Rogers R. editor. Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford; (2008). p. 34–53.