Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 21:9:2609.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02609. eCollection 2018.

Interrelations Between Temporal and Spatial Cognition: The Role of Modality-Specific Processing

Affiliations
Review

Interrelations Between Temporal and Spatial Cognition: The Role of Modality-Specific Processing

Jonna Loeffler et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Temporal and spatial representations are not independent of each other. Two conflicting theories provide alternative hypotheses concerning the specific interrelations between temporal and spatial representations. The asymmetry hypothesis (based on the conceptual metaphor theory, Lakoff and Johnson, 1980) predicts that temporal and spatial representations are asymmetrically interrelated such that spatial representations have a stronger impact on temporal representations than vice versa. In contrast, the symmetry hypothesis (based on a theory of magnitude, Walsh, 2003) predicts that temporal and spatial representations are symmetrically interrelated. Both theoretical approaches have received empirical support. From an embodied cognition perspective, we argue that taking sensorimotor processes into account may be a promising steppingstone to explain the contradictory findings. Notably, different modalities are differently sensitive to the processing of time and space. For instance, auditory information processing is more sensitive to temporal than spatial information, whereas visual information processing is more sensitive to spatial than temporal information. Consequently, we hypothesized that different sensorimotor tasks addressing different modalities may account for the contradictory findings. To test this, we critically reviewed relevant literature to examine which modalities were addressed in time-space mapping studies. Results indicate that the majority of the studies supporting the asymmetry hypothesis applied visual tasks for both temporal and spatial representations. Studies supporting the symmetry hypothesis applied mainly auditory tasks for the temporal domain, but visual tasks for the spatial domain. We conclude that the use of different tasks addressing different modalities may be the primary reason for (a)symmetric effects of space on time, instead of a genuine (a)symmetric mapping.

Keywords: a theory of magnitude; asymmetry hypothesis; conceptual metaphor theory; spatial representation; symmetry hypothesis; temporal representation; time-space mapping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agrillo C., Piffer L. (2012). Musicians outperform nonmusicians in magnitude estimation: evidence of a common processing mechanism for time, space and numbers. J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 2321–2332. 10.1080/17470218.2012.680895 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boroditsky L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75, 1–28. 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bottini R., Casasanto D. (2013). Space and time in the child's mind: metaphoric or ATOMic? Cognition 4, 803 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00803 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bueti D., Walsh V. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol Sci. 364, 1831–1840. 10.1098/rstb.2009.0028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cai Z. G., Connell L. (2015). Space-time interdependence: evidence against asymmetric mapping between time and space. Cognition 136, 268–281. 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.039 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources