Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 21:9:2616.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02616. eCollection 2018.

Orff-Based Music Training Enhances Children's Manual Dexterity and Bimanual Coordination

Affiliations

Orff-Based Music Training Enhances Children's Manual Dexterity and Bimanual Coordination

Marta Martins et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

How music training and expertise influence non-musical abilities is a widely researched topic. Most studies focus on the differences between adult professional musicians and non-musicians, or examine the effects of intensive instrumental training in childhood. However, the impact of music programs developed in regular school contexts for children from low-income communities is poorly explored. We conducted a longitudinal training study in such communities to examine if collective (Orff-based) music training enhances fine motor abilities, when compared to a homologous training program in sports (basketball), and to no specific training. The training programs in music and sports had the same duration, 24 weeks, and were homologous in structure. A pre-test, training, post-test and follow-up design was adopted. Children attending the 3rd grade (n = 74, 40 girls; mean age 8.31 years) were pseudorandomly divided into three groups, music, sports and control that were matched on demographic and intellectual characteristics. Fine motor abilities were assessed with the Purdue pegboard test (eye-hand coordination and motor speed, both subsumed under manual dexterity, and bimanual coordination) and with the Grooved pegboard (manipulative dexterity) test. All groups improved in manipulative dexterity that was not affected by type of training. On bimanual coordination and manual dexterity, however, a robust and stable advantage of music training emerged. At the end of training (post-test), children from the music group significantly outperformed children from the sports and control groups, an advantage that persisted at follow-up 4 months after training at the start of the following school year. Also, at follow-up none of the children from the music group were performing below the 20th percentile in the Purdue pegboard subtests and more than half were performing at the high end level (>80th percentile). Children from the sports group also improved significantly from pre- to post-test but their performance was not significantly different from that of the control group. These results show that an affordable, collective-based music practice impacts positively on fine-motor abilities, a finding that is relevant for a better understanding of the impact of music in childhood development, and that may have implications for education at the primary grade.

Keywords: bimanual coordination; children; fine motor abilities; manual dexterity; music training; sports training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mean scores (pegs per minute) in the Purdue Pegboard test with the preferred hand (A), non-preferred hand (B), or both hands (C), and in the Grooved pegboard test with the preferred hand (D), and non-preferred hand (E), for the music, sports, and control groups at pre-test, post-test, and follow-up. Error bars indicate SEM.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Distribution of children from the three groups according to performance levels: low (<20th percentile), middle (20th–80th percentile), and high (>80th percentile), in the Purdue pegboard test with the preferred hand (A), non-preferred hand (B), and both hands (C).

References

    1. Annett J., Annett M., Hudson P. T., Turner A. (1979). The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 31 641–652. 10.1080/14640747908400755 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baer L., Thibodeau J., Gralnick T., Li K., Penhune V. (2013). The role of musical training in emergent and event-based timing. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7:191. 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00191 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benz S., Sellaro R., Hommel B., Colzato L. S. (2016). Music makes the world go round: the impact of musical training on non-musical cognitive functions - a review. Front. Psychol. 6:2023. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bevilacqua F., Boyer E. O., Françoise J., Houix O., Susini P., Roby-Brami A., et al. (2016). Sensori-motor learning with movement sonification: perspectives from recent interdisciplinary studies. Front. Neurosci. 1:385. 10.3389/fnins.2016.00385 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun Janzen T., Thompson W. F., Ammirante P., Ranvaud R. (2014). Timing skills and expertise: discrete and continuous timed movements among musicians and athletes. Front. Psychol. 5:1482. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01482 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources