Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;10(1):19-27.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676807. Epub 2019 Jan 9.

The Reach and Feasibility of an Interactive Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Delivered by Patient Portal

Affiliations

The Reach and Feasibility of an Interactive Lung Cancer Screening Decision Aid Delivered by Patient Portal

Ajay Dharod et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Health systems could adopt population-level approaches to screening by identifying potential screening candidates from the electronic health record and reaching out to them via the patient portal. However, whether patients would read or act on sent information is unknown. We examined the feasibility of this digital health outreach strategy.

Methods: We conducted a single-arm pragmatic trial in a large academic health system. An electronic health record algorithm identified primary care patients who were potentially eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS). Identified patients were sent a patient portal invitation to visit a LCS interactive Web site which assessed screening eligibility and included a decision aid. The primary outcome was screening completion. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who read the invitation, visited the interactive Web site, and completed the interactive Web site.

Results: We sent portal invitations to 1,000 patients. Almost all patients (86%, 862/1,000) read the invitation, 404 (40%) patients visited the interactive Web site, and 349 patients (35%) completed it. Of the 99 patients who were confirmed screening eligible by the Web site, 81 made a screening decision (30% wanted screening, 44% unsure, 26% declined screening), and 22 patients had a chest computed tomography completed.

Conclusion: The digital outreach strategy reached the majority of patient portal users. While the study focused on LCS, this digital outreach approach could be generalized to other health needs. Given the broad reach and potential low cost of this digital strategy, future research should investigate best practices for implementing the system.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02962115.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example screenshot of mPATH-Lung patient-reported information.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example screenshot of mPATH-Lung personalized risk–benefit information.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pragmatic trial flow diagram.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Time to event plot showing % of sample who read the message and % of sample who visited the Web app over time (from 0 to 120 days).

References

    1. Siegel R L, Miller K D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(01):7–30. - PubMed
    1. Aberle D R, Adams A M, Berg C D et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(05):395–409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith R A, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Brooks D et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015;65(01):30–54. - PubMed
    1. Detterbeck F C, Mazzone P J, Naidich D P, Bach P B.Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines Chest 2013143(5, Suppl):e78S–e92S. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer V A; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement Ann Intern Med 201416005330–338. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data