Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Jan 10;17(1):9.
doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1239-8.

The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lauren C Ramsay et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Conflicting results regarding the impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) may cause confusion regarding the benefits of receiving the current season's vaccine.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from database inception to August 17, 2016, for observational studies published in English that reported VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza for the following four vaccination groups: current season only, prior season only, both seasons, and neither season. We pooled differences in VE (∆VE) between vaccination groups by influenza season and type/subtype using a random-effects model. The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42016037241).

Results: We identified 3435 unique articles, reviewed the full text of 634, and included 20 for meta-analysis. Compared to prior season vaccination only, vaccination in both seasons was associated with greater protection against influenza H1N1 (∆VE = 25%; 95% CI 14%, 35%) and B (∆VE = 18%; 95% CI 3%, 33%), but not H3N2 (∆VE = 7%; 95% CI - 7%, 21%). Compared to no vaccination for either season, individuals who received the current season's vaccine had greater protection against H1N1 (∆VE = 62%; 95% CI 51%, 70%), H3N2 (∆VE = 45%; 95% CI 35%, 53%), and B (∆VE = 64%; 95% CI 57%, 71%). We observed no differences in VE between vaccination in both seasons and the current season only for H1N1 (∆VE = 3%; 95% CI - 8%, 13%), but less protection against influenza H3N2 (∆VE = - 20%; 95% CI - 36%, - 4%), and B (∆VE = - 11%; 95% CI - 20%, - 2%).

Conclusions: Our results support current season vaccination regardless of prior season vaccination because VE for vaccination in the current season only is higher compared to no vaccination in either season for all types/subtypes, and for H1N1 and influenza B, vaccination in both seasons provides better VE than vaccination in the prior season only. Although VE was lower against H3N2 and B for individuals vaccinated in both seasons compared to those vaccinated in the current season only, it should be noted that past vaccination history cannot be altered and this comparison disregards susceptibility to influenza during the prior season among those vaccinated in the current season only. In addition, our results for H3N2 were particularly influenced by the 2014-2015 influenza season and the impact of repeated vaccination for all types/subtypes may vary from season to season. It is important that future VE studies include vaccination history over multiple seasons to evaluate repeated vaccination in more detail.

Keywords: Influenza; Repeated vaccination; Vaccine effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza H1N1 in those vaccinated in both seasons versus those vaccinated in the prior season only
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza H3N2 in those vaccinated in both seasons versus those vaccinated in the prior season only
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza B in those vaccinated in both seasons versus those vaccinated in the prior season only
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza H1N1 in those vaccinated in the current season only versus those vaccinated in neither season
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza H3N2 in those vaccinated in the current season only versus those vaccinated in neither season
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza B in those vaccinated in the current season only versus those vaccinated in neither season
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza H1N1 in those vaccinated in both seasons versus those vaccinated in the current season only
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza H3N2 in those vaccinated in both seasons versus those vaccinated in the current season only
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Comparison of VE estimates against influenza B in those vaccinated in both seasons versus those vaccinated in the current season only

References

    1. World Health Organization Vaccines against influenza WHO position paper—November 2012. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2012;87(47):461–476. - PubMed
    1. National Advisory Committee on Immunization . (NACI): Canadian Immunization Guide Chapter on Influenza and Statement on Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for 2017–2018. Ottawa: PHAC; 2017.
    1. Hoskins T, Davies J, Smith A, Miller C, Allchin A. Assessment of inactivated influenza-A vaccine after three outbreaks of influenza A at Christ’s Hospital. Lancet. 1979;313(8106):33–35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)90468-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Keitel WA, Cate TR, Couch RB, Huggins LL, Hess KR. Efficacy of repeated annual immunization with inactivated influenza virus vaccines over a five year period. Vaccine. 1997;15(10):1114–1122. doi: 10.1016/S0264-410X(97)00003-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beyer WE, de Bruijn IA, Palache AM, Westendorp RG, Osterhaus AD. Protection against influenza after annually repeated vaccination: a meta-analysis of serologic and field studies. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159(2):182–8. - PubMed

Substances