Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan;20(1):126-133.
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0174. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

Fat Quantification in the Vertebral Body: Comparison of Modified Dixon Technique with Single-Voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Fat Quantification in the Vertebral Body: Comparison of Modified Dixon Technique with Single-Voxel Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Sang Hyup Lee et al. Korean J Radiol. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the lumbar vertebral bone marrow fat-signal fractions obtained from six-echo modified Dixon sequence (6-echo m-Dixon) with those from single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in patients with low back pain.

Materials and methods: Vertebral bone marrow fat-signal fractions were quantified by 6-echo m-Dixon (repetition time [TR] = 7.2 ms, echo time (TE) = 1.21 ms, echo spacing = 1.1 ms, total imaging time = 50 seconds) and single-voxel MRS measurements in 25 targets (23 normal bone marrows, two focal lesions) from 24 patients. The point-resolved spectroscopy sequence was used for localized single-voxel MRS (TR = 3000 ms, TE = 35 ms, total scan time = 1 minute 42 seconds). A 2 × 2 × 1.5 cm3 voxel was placed within the normal L2 or L3 vertebral body, or other lesions including a compression fracture or metastasis. The bone marrow fat spectrum was characterized on the basis of the magnitude of measurable fat peaks and a priori knowledge of the chemical structure of triglycerides. The imaging-based fat-signal fraction results were then compared to the MRS-based results.

Results: There was a strong correlation between m-Dixon and MRS-based fat-signal fractions (slope = 0.86, R2 = 0.88, p < 0.001). In Bland-Altman analysis, 92.0% (23/25) of the data points were within the limits of agreement. Bland-Altman plots revealed a slight but systematic error in the m-Dixon based fat-signal fraction, which showed a prevailing overestimation of small fat-signal fractions (< 20%) and underestimation of high fat-signal fractions (> 20%).

Conclusion: Given its excellent agreement with single-voxel-MRS, 6-echo m-Dixon can be used for visual and quantitative evaluation of vertebral bone marrow fat in daily practice.

Keywords: Fat quantification; MR spectroscopy; Modified Dixon; Vertebra.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. 79-year-old man with acute osteoporotic compression fracture at L3 vertebral body.
Median plane from sagittal T1-weighted image (A) shows acute compression fracture of L3 vertebral body with decreased bone marrow signals. Sagittal FF image derived from six-echo modified Dixon sequence method (B) shows decreased FF at affected L3 vertebra, with normal high FFs at other lumbar vertebral bodies. Two 2 × 1.5-cm2 regions-of-interest are shown on affected L3 vertebral body and normal L2 vertebral body. Sagittal (C) image showing 2 × 2 × 1.5-cm2 VOI placed on normal L2 vertebral body for MRS analysis. Another VOI of same size was placed at L3 vertebra (D). FF = fat fraction, MRS = magnetic resonance spectroscopy, VOI = volume of interest
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Typical MRS spectrum from normal L3 vertebral body of 42-year-old woman with nonspecific low back pain.
Various peaks are indicated for fat at 0.90, 1.30, 1.59, 2.00, 2.25, 2.77, 4.20, and 5.31 ppm, and water peak is indicated at 4.65 ppm.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Graph showing linear regression model for FFmrs versus FFdix measurements.
Correlation coefficient R2 = 0.88, with p < 0.001. FFdix = magnetic resonance image-based FF, FFmrs = spectroscopy-based FF
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Bland-Altman plot showing mean measurement bias of 3.6% (FFmrs > FFdix), and limits of agreement ranging from −11% to 18%.
Small systematic error is present with FFdix, which showed slight overestimation of small FF (< 20%) and underestimation of high FF (> 20%). Subject with smallest mean FF (arrow) shows overestimation of FFdix, whereas subject with second smallest mean FF (arrowhead) shows underestimation. SD = standard deviation

References

    1. Hu HH, Kim HW, Nayak KS, Goran MI. Comparison of fat-water MRI and single-voxel MRS in the assessment of hepatic and pancreatic fat fractions in humans. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010;18:841–847. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Livingstone RS, Begovatz P, Kahl S, Nowotny B, Strassburger K, Giani G, et al. Initial clinical application of modified Dixon with flexible echo times: hepatic and pancreatic fat assessments in comparison with (1)H MRS. MAGMA. 2014;27:397–405. - PubMed
    1. Kim YP, Kannengiesser S, Paek MY, Kim S, Chung TS, Yoo YH, et al. Differentiation between focal malignant marrow-replacing lesions and benign red marrow deposition of the spine with T2*-corrected fat-signal fraction map using a three-echo volume interpolated breath-hold gradient echo Dixon sequence. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:781–791. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yoo HJ, Hong SH, Kim DH, Choi JY, Chae HD, Jeong BM, et al. Measurement of fat content in vertebral marrow using a modified dixon sequence to differentiate benign from malignant processes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45:1534–1544. - PubMed
    1. Griffith JF, Yeung DK, Antonio GE, Lee FK, Hong AW, Wong SY, et al. Vertebral bone mineral density, marrow perfusion, and fat content in healthy men and men with osteoporosis: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2005;236:945–951. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms