Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0208464.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208464. eCollection 2019.

Systematic review of quality of life measures in patients with endometriosis

Nicolas Bourdel  1   2 , Pauline Chauvet  1   2 , Valentina Billone  3 , Giannis Douridas  1 , Arnaud Fauconnier  4 , Laurent Gerbaud  5 , Michel Canis  1   2
Affiliations

Systematic review of quality of life measures in patients with endometriosis

Nicolas Bourdel et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: Endometriosis and quality of life has been the subject of much research, however, there is little consensus on how best to evaluate quality of life in endometriosis, resulting in many and diverse scales being used. In our study, we aim to identify quality of life scales used in endometriosis, to review their strengths and weaknesses and to establish what would define an ideal scale in the evaluation of endometriosis-related quality of life.

Materials and methods: A search of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was carried out for publications in English and French for the period from 1980 to February 2017, using the words 'endometriosis' and 'quality of life'. Publications were selected if they reported on quality of life in patients with endometriosis and specified use of a quality of life scale. A quantitative and a qualitative analysis of each scale was performed in order to establish the strengths and weaknesses for each scale (systematic registration number: PROSPERO 2014: CRD42014014210).

Results: A total of 1538 articles publications were initially identified. After exclusion of duplicates and application of inclusion criteria, 201 studies were selected for analysis. The SF-36, a generic HRQoL measure, was found to be the most frequently used scale, followed by the EHP-30, a measure specific to endometriosis. Both perform well, when compared with other scales, with scale weaknesses offset by strengths. EHP-5 and EQ-5D also showed to be of good quality. All four were the only scales to report on MCID studied in endometriosis patients.

Conclusion: For clinical practice, routine evaluation of HRQOL in women with endometriosis is essential both for health-care providers and patients. Both SF-36 and EHP-30 perform better overall with regard to their strengths and weaknesses when compared to other scales.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Characteristics of quality of life scales: Strengths and weaknesses.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bourdel N, Alves J, Pickering G, Ramilo I, Roman H, Canis M. Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale? Hum Reprod Update. 2015. January 1;21(1):136–52. 10.1093/humupd/dmu046 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moradi M, Parker M, Sneddon A, Lopez V, Ellwood D. Impact of endometriosis on women’s lives: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health [Internet]. 2014. December [cited 2018 Jul 19];14(1). http://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1472-6874-14-123 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garry R, Clayton R, Hawe J. The effect of endometriosis and its radical laparoscopic excision on quality of life indicators. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000. January;107(1):44–54. - PubMed
    1. Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S. Evaluating the responsiveness of the Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire: the EHP-30. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2004. April;13(3):705–13. - PubMed
    1. Meuleman C, D’Hoore A, Van Cleynenbreugel B, Beks N, D’Hooghe T. Outcome after multidisciplinary CO2 laser laparoscopic excision of deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009. February;18(2):282–9. - PubMed

Publication types