Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210432.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210432. eCollection 2019.

Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems

Beth Clark  1 , Luca A Panzone  1 , Gavin B Stewart  1 , Ilias Kyriazakis  1 , Jarkko K Niemi  2 , Terhi Latvala  2 , Richard Tranter  3 , Philip Jones  3 , Lynn J Frewer  1
Affiliations

Consumer attitudes towards production diseases in intensive production systems

Beth Clark et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Many members of the public and important stakeholders operating at the upper end of the food chain, may be unfamiliar with how food is produced, including within modern animal production systems. The intensification of production is becoming increasingly common in modern farming. However, intensive systems are particularly susceptible to production diseases, with potentially negative consequences for farm animal welfare (FAW). Previous research has demonstrated that the public are concerned about FAW, yet there has been little research into attitudes towards production diseases, and their approval of interventions to reduce these. This research explores the public's attitudes towards, and preferences for, FAW interventions in five European countries (Finland, Germany, Poland, Spain and the UK). An online survey was conducted for broilers (n = 789), layers (n = 790) and pigs (n = 751). Data were analysed by means of Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. The results suggest that the public have concerns regarding intensive production systems, in relation to FAW, naturalness and the use of antibiotics. The most preferred interventions were the most "proactive" interventions, namely improved housing and hygiene measures. The least preferred interventions were medicine-based, which raised humane animal care and food safety concerns amongst respondents. The results highlighted the influence of the identified concerns, perceived risks and benefits on attitudes and subsequent behavioural intention, and the importance of supply chain stakeholders addressing these concerns in the subsequent communications with the public.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Hypotheses to be tested in the research.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. European Commission. Attitudes of EU citizens towards animal welfare. 2007.
    1. Kjærnes U, Lavik R. Farm animal welfare and food consumption practices: Results from surveys in seven countries. Cardiff: School of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff Univeristy, 2007.
    1. Fraser D. Animal welfare and the intensification of animal production. An alternative interpretation. 2005.
    1. Perry BD, Grace D, Sones K. Current drivers and future directions of global livestock disease dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(52):20871–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawkins MS. Animal welfare and efficient farming: is conflict inevitable? Animal Production Science. 2017;57(2):201–8.

Publication types