Children's Judgments of Epistemic and Moral Agents: From Situations to Intentions
- PMID: 30629887
- DOI: 10.1177/1745691618805452
Children's Judgments of Epistemic and Moral Agents: From Situations to Intentions
Abstract
Children's evaluations of moral and epistemic agents crucially depend on their discerning that an agent's actions were performed intentionally. Here we argue that children's epistemic and moral judgments reveal practices of forgiveness and blame, trust and mistrust, and objection or disapproval and that such practices are supported by children's monitoring of the situational constraints on agents. Inherent in such practices is the understanding that agents are responsible for actions performed under certain conditions but not others. We discuss a range of situational constraints on children's early epistemic and moral evaluations and clarify how these situational constraints serve to support children's identification of intentional actions. By monitoring the situation, children distinguish intentional from less intentional action and selectively hold epistemic and moral agents accountable. We argue that these findings inform psychological and philosophical theorizing about attributions of moral and epistemic agency and responsibility.
Keywords: children; development; judgment; philosophy; reasoning; social cognition; thinking.
Similar articles
-
The influence of negligence, intention, and outcome on children's moral judgments.J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Dec;104(4):382-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 8. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009. PMID: 19740483
-
The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments.Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:190-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Sep 17. Cognition. 2016. PMID: 27649094
-
Manipulating Morality: Third-Party Intentions Alter Moral Judgments by Changing Causal Reasoning.Cogn Sci. 2015 Aug;39(6):1320-47. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12194. Epub 2014 Nov 9. Cogn Sci. 2015. PMID: 25382593 Clinical Trial.
-
Content counts: A trait and moral reasoning framework for children's selective social learning.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2020;58:95-136. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Mar 2. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2020. PMID: 32169200 Review.
-
Unifying pedagogical reasoning and epistemic trust.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:295-319. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00011-3. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012. PMID: 23205416 Review.
Cited by
-
Gender stereotypes regarding power and niceness in Japanese children.R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jul 24;11(7):230863. doi: 10.1098/rsos.230863. eCollection 2024 Jul. R Soc Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39050713 Free PMC article.
-
Emphasizing others' persistence can promote unwarranted social inferences in children and adults.J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Oct;152(10):2977-2988. doi: 10.1037/xge0001428. Epub 2023 May 18. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023. PMID: 37199969 Free PMC article.
-
Exploration of Students' Perception of Academic Misconduct: Do Individual Factors, Moral Philosophy, Behavioral Intention, and Judgment Matter?Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 5;13:857943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.857943. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35450332 Free PMC article.
-
Trusting young children to help causes them to cheat less.Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Apr;8(4):668-678. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01837-4. Epub 2024 Feb 20. Nat Hum Behav. 2024. PMID: 38379064
-
The intentions of information sources can affect what information people think qualifies as true.Sci Rep. 2023 May 12;13(1):7718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34806-4. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37173351 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials