Hospitalising preterm infants in single family rooms versus open bay units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 30630745
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30375-4
Hospitalising preterm infants in single family rooms versus open bay units: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The effect of the hospital environment on health and specifically neurodevelopment in preterm infants remains under debate. We assessed outcomes of preterm infants hospitalised in single family rooms compared with common open bay units.
Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CENTRAL (the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to Aug 13, 2018, using controlled terms (ie, MeSH terms) and text words related to prematurity and neonatal intensive care unit design. We included randomised and non-randomised studies investigating clinical outcomes of preterm infants. We assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool for randomised controlled trials and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Non-randomised Studies of Interventions. We calculated summary estimates for meta-analysis using random effects models. The primary outcome was age appropriate long-term neurodevelopment. Secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, sepsis, breastfeeding, growth, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, and mortality. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42016050643.
Findings: We identified 487 records. 13 study populations (n=4793) were included. No difference in cognitive neurodevelopment was found on the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III at 18-24 months of corrected age (680 infants analysed; mean difference 1·04 [95% CI -3·45 to 5·52], p=0·65; I2=42%). The incidence of sepsis was lower (4165 infants analysed; 108 035 days in hospital [hospitalisation days]; risk ratio 0·63 [95% CI 0·50 to 0·78], p<0·0001; I2=0%) and exclusive breastfeeding at discharge was higher (484 infants analysed; 1·31 [1·07 to 1·61], p=0·01; I2=0%) in single family rooms than in open bay units. We found no differences in length of hospital stay, growth, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity, and mortality.
Interpretation: Single family rooms should be considered to hospitalise preterm infants because incidence of sepsis is reduced and exclusive breastfeeding is higher. No difference in long-term neurodevelopment was detected.
Funding: None.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Are single family rooms the future for neonatal units?Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019 Mar;3(3):130-131. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30402-4. Epub 2019 Jan 8. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019. PMID: 30630746 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Effect of single family rooms for preterm infants on neurodevelopment: study protocol for a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e015818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015818. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28780548 Free PMC article.
-
Hospitalising preterm infants in single family rooms versus open bay units: A systematic review and meta-analysis of impact on parents.EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jun 6;23:100388. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100388. eCollection 2020 Jun. EClinicalMedicine. 2020. PMID: 32548575 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of interventions during NICU hospitalization on the neurodevelopment of preterm infants: a systematic review protocol.Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;6(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0613-5. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29100533 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of breastfeeding and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infant.Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;12:1401250. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401250. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39639909 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of family-centred care interventions on preterm infants and parents in neonatal intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Aust Crit Care. 2019 Jan;32(1):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Dec 13. Aust Crit Care. 2019. PMID: 30554939
Cited by
-
The road to zero nosocomial infections in neonates-a narrative review.Acta Paediatr. 2021 Aug;110(8):2326-2335. doi: 10.1111/apa.15886. Epub 2021 May 6. Acta Paediatr. 2021. PMID: 33955065 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Maternal stress is associated with higher protein-bound amino acid concentrations in human milk.Front Nutr. 2023 Sep 7;10:1165764. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1165764. eCollection 2023. Front Nutr. 2023. PMID: 37743929 Free PMC article.
-
The development of neonatal neurointensive care.Pediatr Res. 2024 Sep;96(4):868-874. doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0729-5. Epub 2019 Dec 18. Pediatr Res. 2024. PMID: 31852010 Review.
-
A comparative study of mothers of infants hospitalized in an open ward neonatal intensive care unit and a combined pod and single-family room design.BMC Pediatr. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1929-1. BMC Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 31996178 Free PMC article.
-
Practices supporting cue-based breastfeeding of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care units across Europe.Int Breastfeed J. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13006-024-00697-y. Int Breastfeed J. 2025. PMID: 39748409 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical