Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Dec 2:7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1881.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15441.1. eCollection 2018.

Recent advances in improving the effectiveness and reducing the complications of abortion

Affiliations
Review

Recent advances in improving the effectiveness and reducing the complications of abortion

Sharon Cameron. F1000Res. .

Abstract

When conducted in a legal setting and under safe conditions, abortion is an extremely effective and safe procedure. Tragically, almost half of all abortions that take place in the world are conducted under unsafe conditions, mostly in countries where abortion is illegal or highly restricted. These unsafe abortions are a major cause of maternal death and disability. Restricting a woman's access to abortion does not prevent abortion but simply leads to more unsafe abortions. Barriers to safe abortion are many but include legal barriers, health policy barriers, shortages of trained healthcare workers, and stigma surrounding abortion. This commentary will consider some recent advances to improve access to safe abortion as well as refinements in abortion methods and service delivery in settings where safe abortion is available that further improve the care and wellbeing of women who seek abortion.

Keywords: abortion; complications; global abortion; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; surgical abortion; termination; unsafe abortion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raymond EG, Grossman D, Weaver MA, et al. : Mortality of induced abortion, other outpatient surgical procedures and common activities in the United States. Contraception. 2014;90(5):476–9. 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raymond EG, Grimes DA: The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119(2 Pt 1):215–9. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31823fe923 - DOI - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Taylor D, Upadhyay UD, Fjerstad M, et al. : Standardizing the classification of abortion incidents: the Procedural Abortion Incident Reporting and Surveillance (PAIRS) Framework. Contraception. 2017;96(1):1–13. 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. White K, Carroll E, Grossman D: Complications from first-trimester aspiration abortion: a systematic review of the literature. Contraception. 2015;92(5):422–38. 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.07.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization: Health Worker Roles in Providing Safe Abortion Care and Post-Abortion Contraception.Accessed 18 June 2018.2015. - PubMed

MeSH terms