Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 12:7:1784.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16771.2. eCollection 2018.

Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices

Affiliations

Key Concepts for assessing claims about treatment effects and making well-informed treatment choices

Andrew David Oxman et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Background: The Informed Health Choices (IHC) Key Concepts are standards for judgement, or principles for evaluating the trustworthiness of treatment claims and treatment comparisons (evidence) used to support claims, and for making treatment choices. The list of concepts provides a framework, or starting point, for teachers, journalists and other intermediaries for identifying and developing resources (such as longer explanations, examples, games and interactive applications) to help people to understand and apply the concepts. The first version of the list was published in 2015 and has been updated yearly since then. We report here the changes that have been made from when the list was first published up to the current (2018) version. Methods: We developed the IHC Key Concepts by searching the literature and checklists written for the public, journalists, and health professionals; and by considering concepts related to assessing the certainty of evidence about the effects of treatments. We have revised the Key Concepts yearly, based on feedback and suggestions; and learning from using the IHC Key Concepts, other relevant frameworks, and adaptation of the IHC Key Concepts to other types of interventions besides treatments. Results: We have made many changes since the Key Concepts were first published in 2015. There are now 44 Key Concepts compared to the original 32; the concepts have been reorganised from six to three groups; we have added higher-level concepts in each of those groups; we have added short titles; and we have made changes to many of the concepts. Conclusions: The IHC Key Concepts have proven useful in designing learning resources, evaluating them, and organising them. We will continue to revise the IHC Key Concepts in response to feedback. We welcome suggestions for how to do this.

Keywords: causal inference; concepts; critical appraisal; critical thinking; epistemology; informed decision making; treatment claims.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

References

    1. Wang MTM, Grey A, Bolland MJ: Conflicts of interest and expertise of independent commenters in news stories about medical research. CMAJ. 2017;189(15):E553–E559. 10.1503/cmaj.160538 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh-Childers K, Braddock J, Rabaza C, et al. : One step forward, one step back: changes in news coverage of medical interventions. Health Commun. 2016;16:1–14. - PubMed
    1. Sumner P, Vivian-Griffiths S, Bolvin J, et al. : Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168217. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168217 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwitzer G: A guide to reading health care news stories. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(7):1183–6. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.1359 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moorhead SA, Hazlet DE, Harrison L, et al. : A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. 10.2196/jmir.1933 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources