The CI Index (CII): A New Instrument to Evaluate and Foster Collaborative Partnership in Public Health
- PMID: 30631639
- PMCID: PMC6322632
- DOI: 10.21106/ijma.265
The CI Index (CII): A New Instrument to Evaluate and Foster Collaborative Partnership in Public Health
Abstract
Background or objectives: Collective Impact (CI) is the sum of collaborative actions through coalition building to examine and address issues that threaten public health. We sought to develop an instrument to measure CI across diverse health-related organizations.
Methods: The study was performed in 5 phases initiated with a comprehensive literature review through the generation of candidate items using a deductive instrument development approach. A matrix was then created to map assembled items onto related CI domains. An one-hundred and nine (n=109) item questionnaire covering multiple items per domain was administered to 200 health-related organizations selected randomly throughout the United States. Survey data were evaluated using Principal Component Analysis and Kaiser criterion or eigenvalue-greater-than-one rule was the factor retention method utilized.
Results: Based on Kaiser's eigenvalue criteria and communality estimates, the number of items across the five domains of CI was reduced from 109 to 20, with 4 items populating each subdomain. All communality estimates in the final instrument had values > 0.6, which was sufficiently adequate as per Kaiser's criterion.
Conclusion and global health implications: This pilot study demonstrates CI represents a multi-factorial concept with domains that are multi-dimensional capturing diverse aspects of a construct. We developed the first measure of CI for public health practice. The index bears potential utility for assessing and monitoring areas of strengths and weaknesses within collaborative partnerships across the spectrum of population health.
Keywords: CI; Collaborative Partnerships; Federal Healthy Start; Index; Program Evaluation; Public Health Practice.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.
Similar articles
-
Conceptualizing Interprofessional Teams as Multi-Team Systems-Implications for Assessment and Training.Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):366-9. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077136. Teach Learn Med. 2015. PMID: 26507993
-
Development of a simple 12-item theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development on clinical behavioral intentions.PLoS One. 2014 Mar 18;9(3):e91013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091013. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24643173 Free PMC article.
-
A modified screening tool for autism (Checklist for Autism in Toddlers [CHAT-23]) for Chinese children.Pediatrics. 2004 Aug;114(2):e166-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.2.e166. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15286253
-
The development of measures of community capacity for community-based funding programs in Canada.Health Promot Int. 2007 Dec;22(4):299-306. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dam024. Epub 2007 Oct 17. Health Promot Int. 2007. PMID: 17942594 Review.
-
A Participatory, Mixed Methods Approach to Define and Measure Partnership Synergy in Long-standing Equity-focused CBPR Partnerships.Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Dec;66(3-4):427-438. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12447. Epub 2020 Aug 3. Am J Community Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32744781 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dooley KJ. A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organization Change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences. 1997;1(1):69–97. - PubMed
-
- Sturmberg J, Lanham HJ. Understanding health care delivery as a complex system Achieving best possible health outcomes for individuals and communities by focusing on interdependencies. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2014;20(6):1005–1009. - PubMed
-
- Chin JJ, Abesamis-Mendoza N. Project CHARGE:Building an Urban Health Policy Advocacy Community. Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action. 2012;6(1):17–23. - PubMed
-
- Kahn CN, 3rd, Pollack RF. Building a consensus for expanding health coverage. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(1):40–48. - PubMed
-
- Kania J, Kramer M.CI. Stanford Social Innovation Review 2011(Winter 2011) :36–41.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources