Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jun;22(3):396-404.
doi: 10.1111/hex.12859. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

Rehabilitation environments: Service users' perspective

Maggie Killington  1   2 , Dean Fyfe  3 , Allan Patching  4 , Paul Habib  1 , Annabel McNamara  1   2 , Rachael Kay  3 , Venugopal Kochiyil  4 , Maria Crotty  1   2
Affiliations

Rehabilitation environments: Service users' perspective

Maggie Killington et al. Health Expect. 2019 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Design of rehabilitation environments is usually "expert" driven with little consideration given to the perceptions of service users, especially patients and informal carers. There is a need to engage with consumers of services to gain their insights into what design aspects are required to facilitate optimum physical activity, social interaction and psychological responses when they are attempting to overcome their limitations and regain function.

Research design: Qualitative exploratory study.

Method: Interviews were conducted with patients (n = 54) and informal carers (n = 23), and focus groups with rehabilitation staff (n = 90), from the three metropolitan South Australia rehabilitation health services, comprising different building and environmental configurations. Thematic analysis was assisted by the use of NVivo 11 qualitative software, with pooled data from all interviews and focus groups undergoing open, axial and finally selective coding.

Results: Four major themes were identified as follows: (a) choice can be an Illusion in a rehabilitation ward; (b) access to outside areas is a priority and affects well-being; (c) socialization can be facilitated by the environment; and (d) ward configuration should align with the model of care.

Discussion and conclusion: Participants who encountered the most restrictive environments accepted their situation until probed to consider alternatives; those who enjoyed the most choice and access to facilities showed the greatest enthusiasm for these affordances. Future architectural designers should therefore consider the perceptions of a wide range of consumers with varying experiences to ensure they understand the complex requirements of patients and that the ward design facilitates the optimum rehabilitation model of care.

Keywords: buildings; carers; choices; clinicians; consumers; environments; outside; patients; rehabilitation; well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Maggie Killington, Mr Dean Fyfe, Mr Allan Patching, Mr Paul Habib, Dr Annabel McNamara, Ms Rachael Kay, Dr Venugopal Kochiyil and Professor Maria Crotty have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Pryor J. Creating a rehabilitative milieu. Rehabil Nurs. 2000;25(4):141‐144.
    1. Perkins NH. Including patients, staff and visitors in the design of the psychiatric milieu. Notes from the field. Facilities. 2013;31(9/10):379‐390.
    1. Milne P, Eagar K. Rehabilitation Services in Tasmania: Current Situation and Future Plans. Wollongong: Centre for Health Service Development; 2007.
    1. Bargh JA, Dijksterhuis A. The perception‐behavior expressway: automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2001;33:1‐40.
    1. Golembiewski J. We are our architecture. Science and Non‐duality Conference. San Rafael, CA: Centre for Consciousness Studies, University of Arizona; 2009.

Publication types