Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;14(4):557-565.
doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.247421.

Corneal re-innervation following refractive surgery treatments

Francisco Bandeira  1 , Nur Zahira Yusoff  2 , Gary Hin-Fai Yam  3 , Jodhbir Singh Mehta  4
Affiliations
Review

Corneal re-innervation following refractive surgery treatments

Francisco Bandeira et al. Neural Regen Res. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Laser refractive surgery is one of the most performed surgical procedures in the world. Although regarded safe and efficient, it has side effects. All of the laser based refractive surgical procedures invoke corneal nerve injury to some degree. The impact of this denervation can range from mild discomfort to neurotrophic corneas. Currently, three techniques are widely used for laser vision correction: small incision lenticule extraction, laser-assisted keratomileusis in situ and photorefractive keratotomy. Each of these techniques affects corneal innervation differently and has a different pattern of nerve regeneration. The purpose of this review is to summarize the different underlying mechanisms for corneal nerve injury and compare the different patterns of corneal reinnervation.

Keywords: corneal nerve; corneal sensation; in vivo confocal microscopy; laser-assisted keratomileusis in situ; photorefractive keratotomy; refractive surgery; small incision manual lenticule extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histological crossection of a human cornea (hematoxylin-eosin staining). Montage of a whole cornea and an insert of the corneal layers (4× magnification). The red arrowheads correspond to the epithelial layer; the corneal stroma is comprised between the white brackets; and the green arrowheads delineate the endothelial layer. The Bowman layer is delimited by the blue dashed and yellow dotted lines. The image is provided by Singapore Eye Research Institute Image Library.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Corneal nerve distribution. Confocal microscopy montage of a whole cornea mount stained with DAPI (blue); phalloidin (red) and TuJ-1 (green). The nerve distribution is shown in two different perspectives. (A) Crossection of the whole cornea 5× magnification, the white square shows a 20× magnification, the white arrowheads show intense green signal – which are the stromal and sub-basal nerves running parallel to collagen fibers. (B) Flat-mount confocal 3D image of a SMILE lenticule; images from the top to bottom of the lenticule were taken 5 µm apart and stacked into a single frame; the white arrows indicate the disposition of corneal nerves. SMILE: Small incision manual lenticule extraction; DAPI: 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. The image is provided by Singapore Eye Research Institute Image Library.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematics of the different refractive surgical procedures. (A) Small incision lenticule extraction; (B) laser-assisted keratomileusis in situ; (C) photorrefractive keratectomy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Corneal re-innervation. The chart displays the mean recovery of corneal nerve density over time compared to baseline. The colored lines represent the different procedures: blue for PRK; red for LASIK; and green for SMILE. The error bars represent the standard deviation. PRK: Photorefractive keratotomy; LASIK: laser-assisted keratomileusis in situ; SMILE: small incision manual lenticule extraction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Corneal sensitivity recovery. The chart displays the mean recovery of corneal sensitivity over time compared to baseline. The colored lines represent the different procedures: blue for PRK; red for LASIK; and green for SMILE. The error bars represent the standard deviation. PRK: Photorefractive keratotomy; LASIK: laser-assisted keratomileusis in situ; SMILE: small incision manual lenticule extraction.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Acosta MC, Peral A, Luna C, Pintor J, Belmonte C, Gallar J. Tear secretion induced by selective stimulation of corneal and conjunctival sensory nerve fibers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2333–2336. - PubMed
    1. Agca A, Cankaya KI, Yilmaz I, Yildirim Y, Yasa D, Olcucu O, Demircan A, Demirok A, Yilmaz OF. Fellow eye comparison of nerve fiber regeneration after smile and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a confocal microscopy study. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:594–598. - PubMed
    1. Al-Aqaba MA, Alomar T, Miri A, Fares U, Otri AM, Dua HS. Ex vivo confocal microscopy of human corneal nerves. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:1251–1257. - PubMed
    1. Alcalde I, Inigo-Portugues A, Carreno N, Riestra AC, Merayo-Lloves JM. Effects of new biomimetic regenerating agents on corneal wound healing in an experimental model of post-surgical corneal ulcers. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 2015;90:467–474. - PubMed
    1. Azar DT, Primack JD. Theoretical analysis of ablation depths and profiles in laser in situ keratomileusis for compound hyperopic and mixed astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26:1123–1136. - PubMed