Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology
- PMID: 30633111
- PMCID: PMC6600813
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000001
Guidelines for Reporting of Statistics for Clinical Research in Urology
Abstract
In an effort to improve the quality of statistics in the clinical urology literature, statisticians at European Urology, The Journal of Urology, Urology and BJUI came together to develop a set of guidelines to address common errors of statistical analysis, reporting and interpretation. Authors should “break any of the guidelines if it makes scientific sense to do so” but would need to provide a clear justification. Adoption of the guidelines will in our view not only increase the quality of published papers in our journals but improve statistical knowledge in our field in general.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Scales CD Jr., Norris RD, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Dahm P. Clinical research and statistical methods in the urology literature. The Journal of urology. 2005;174:1374–9. - PubMed
-
- Lang TA, Altman DG. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: the “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines. International journal of nursing studies. 2015;52:5–9. - PubMed
-
- Vickers AJ, Sjoberg DD, European U. Guidelines for reporting of statistics in European Urology. European urology. 2015;67:181–7. - PubMed
-
- Woolston C Psychology journal bans P-values. Nature. Nature: Nature; 2015.
-
- Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician. 2016;70:129–33.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources