Nomogram for Predicting Individual Survival After Recurrence of Advanced-Stage, High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma
- PMID: 30633128
- PMCID: PMC6551603
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003086
Nomogram for Predicting Individual Survival After Recurrence of Advanced-Stage, High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma
Erratum in
-
Nomogram for Predicting Individual Survival After Recurrence of Advanced-Stage, High-Grade Ovarian Carcinoma: Correction.Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):830. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003212. Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30913186 No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze clinical prognostic factors for survival after recurrence of high-grade, advanced-stage ovarian-peritoneal-tubal carcinoma and to develop a nomogram to predict individual survival after recurrence.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients treated in multicenter Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols for stage III and IV ovarian-peritoneal-tubal carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery, received chemotherapy with paclitaxel and a platinum compound, and subsequently developed recurrence. Prognostic factors affecting survival were identified and used to develop a nomogram, which was both internally and externally validated.
Results: There were 4,739 patients included in this analysis, of whom, 84% had stage III and 16% had stage IV ovarian carcinoma. At a median follow-up of 88.8 months (95% CI 86.2-92.0 months), the vast majority of patients (89.4%) had died. The median survival after recurrence was 21.4 months (95% CI 20.5-21.9 months). Time to recurrence after initial chemotherapy, clear cell or mucinous histology, performance status, stage IV disease, and age were significant variables used to develop a nomogram for survival after recurrence, which had a concordance index of 0.67. The time to recurrence alone accounted for 85% of the prognostic information. Similar results were found for patients who underwent second look laparotomy and had a complete pathologic response or received intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Conclusion: For individuals with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma who recur after standard first-line therapy, estimated survivals after recurrence are closely related to the time to recurrence after chemotherapy and prognostic variables can be used to predict subsequent survival.
Clinical trial registration: ClinialTrials.gov, NCT00002568, NCT00837993, NCT00002717, NCT01074398, and NCT00011986.
Conflict of interest statement
Financial Disclosure
Melissa Geller has received research grants from Genentech Inc., FATE Therapeutics, Morphotek, and TESARO, Inc. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. : Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 334:1–6, 1996. - PubMed
-
- Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, James K, et al. : Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin-paclitaxel versus cisplatin-cyclophosphamide in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Three-year results. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:699–708, 2000 - PubMed
-
- Taxol® (NatlSC125973). National Cancer Institute. https://dtp.cancer.gov/timeline/flash/success_stories/S2_taxol.htm
-
- Vasey PA, Jayson GC, Gordon A, et al. : Phase III randomized trial of docetaxel-carboplatin versus paclitaxel-carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1682–1691, 2004 - PubMed
-
- du Bois A, Lück HJ, Meier W, et al. : A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1320–1329, 2003 - PubMed
