Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 9;10(1):34.
doi: 10.3390/genes10010034.

Using a Chemical Genetic Screen to Enhance Our Understanding of the Antimicrobial Properties of Gallium against Escherichia coli

Affiliations

Using a Chemical Genetic Screen to Enhance Our Understanding of the Antimicrobial Properties of Gallium against Escherichia coli

Natalie Gugala et al. Genes (Basel). .

Abstract

The diagnostic and therapeutic agent gallium offers multiple clinical and commercial uses including the treatment of cancer and the localization of tumors, among others. Further, this metal has been proven to be an effective antimicrobial agent against a number of microbes. Despite the latter, the fundamental mechanisms of gallium action have yet to be fully identified and understood. To further the development of this antimicrobial, it is imperative that we understand the mechanisms by which gallium interacts with cells. As a result, we screened the Escherichia coli Keio mutant collection as a means of identifying the genes that are implicated in prolonged gallium toxicity or resistance and mapped their biological processes to their respective cellular system. We discovered that the deletion of genes functioning in response to oxidative stress, DNA or iron⁻sulfur cluster repair, and nucleotide biosynthesis were sensitive to gallium, while Ga resistance comprised of genes involved in iron/siderophore import, amino acid biosynthesis and cell envelope maintenance. Altogether, our explanations of these findings offer further insight into the mechanisms of gallium toxicity and resistance in E. coli.

Keywords: Escherichia coli; antimicrobial agents; gallium; metal resistance; metal toxicity; metal-based antimicrobials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Synthetic Array Tools (version 1.0) was used to normalize and score the Gallium(III) (Ga) resistant and sensitive hits as a means of representing the growth differences in Escherichia coli K12 BW25113 in the presence of 100 μM Ga(NO3)3. Each individual score represents the mean of 9–12 trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ga-resistant and -sensitive gene hits mapped to component cellular processes. Several gene hits are mapped to more than one subsystem. The cutoff fitness score selected was two standard deviations from the mean and recovered gene hits with a score outside this range were chosen for further analyses. The hits were mined using the Omics Dashboard (Pathway Tools), which surveys against the EcoCyc database. Each individual score represents the mean of 9–12 trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Functional enrichment among the Ga-resistant and -sensitive gene hits. The DAVID gene functional classification (version 6.8) database, a false discovery rate of 10% and a cutoff score two standard deviations from the mean was used to measure the magnitude of enrichment of the selected gene hits against the genome of E. coli K-12. Only processes with gene hits ≥3 were included.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Connectivity map displaying the predicted functional associations between the Ga-sensitive gene hits; disconnected gene hits not shown. The thicknesses of the lines indicate the degree of confidence prediction for the given interaction, based on fusion, curated databases, experimental and co-expression evidence. Figure generated using STRING (version 10.5) and a medium confidence score of 0.4.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Connectivity map displaying the predicted functional associations between the Ga-resistant gene hits; disconnected gene hits not shown. The thicknesses of the lines indicate the degree of confidence prediction for the given interaction, based on fusion, curated database, experimental and co-expression evidence. Figure generated using STRING (version 10.5) and a medium confidence score of 0.4.

References

    1. Chitambar C.R. The therapeutic potential of iron-targeting gallium compounds in human disease: From basic research to clinical application. Pharmacol. Res. 2017;115:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.11.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonchi C., Imperi F., Minandri F., Visca P., Frangipani E. Repurposing of gallium-based drugs for antibacterial therapy. BioFactors. 2014;40:303–312. doi: 10.1002/biof.1159. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bernstein L.R. Mechanisms of therapeutic activity for gallium. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998;50:665–682. - PubMed
    1. Pearson R.G. Hard and soft acids and bases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963;85:3533–3539. doi: 10.1021/ja00905a001. - DOI
    1. Harris W.R., Pecoraro V.L. Thermodynamic binding constants for gallium transferrin. Biochemistry. 1983;22:292–299. doi: 10.1021/bi00271a010. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding