Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1988 Nov;36(5):616-32.
doi: 10.2165/00003495-198836050-00005.

Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for antiarrhythmic drug use

Affiliations
Review

Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for antiarrhythmic drug use

R W Campbell. Drugs. 1988 Nov.

Abstract

Arrhythmia treatment has always been difficult, particularly as there are no good indicators of the optimal management strategy. The introduction of new antiarrhythmic agents has forced reappraisal of how these drugs are used. Dynamic electrocardiography and invasive electrophysiological studies are important tools for classifying and characterizing arrhythmias and for assessing the efficacy of therapy. There is still an enormous gulf between present day treatment and a scientific basis for drug selection, but risk-benefit analysis is possible, at least for patient populations and for some specific arrhythmias. Individual risk-benefit analysis, much needed by clinicians, is still a long way from reality. This article examines the concept of risk-benefit analysis and indicates those areas where progress can be made.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Acta Med Scand Suppl. 1970;513:1-80 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1976 Oct;38(10):1053-7 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 1987 Mar;8 Suppl A:105-11 - PubMed
    1. Eur Heart J. 1984 Mar;5 Suppl A:95-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Heart J. 1981 Aug;46(2):173-8 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources