Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Nov;6(6):478-485.

Comparison of Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Thumb Splinting for Carpometacarpal Arthrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Comparison of Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Thumb Splinting for Carpometacarpal Arthrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Aslan Baradaran et al. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The goal of this study was to compare the two types of orthoses, prefabricated soft splints versus short thermoplastic custom-made splints, that are the most commonly used for the management of first carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review in the literature based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We extracted the outcomes of disability scores, pain scores, grip and pinch strength and gathered the unified data accordingly.

Results: We included five randomized clinical trials with 230 patients with the mean age of 61 years and the mean follow-up of 8.1 weeks. The results of the pooled data demonstrated only a statistically significant difference in disability scores among splints in favor of the prefabricated splints. The rest of the outcome measures consisting of pain, grip strength, and pinch strength were not statistically different.

Conclusion: According to our systematic review and meta-analysis, both thumb-based splints improved pain and function in the first CMC OA in a short-term follow-up, nevertheless the efficacy of prefabricated splints in abatement of disability scores was significantly higher than custom-made splints. In contrast, the other outcome measures including pain, grip and pinch strength were improved identically after wearing either of the splints.

Level of evidence: II.

Keywords: Carpometacarpal joint; Meta-analysis; Splint; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of disability scores after standardizing 3 scores of DASH, AUSCAN and FIHOA using random effect model shows significant difference between the 2 types of splints favoring prefabricated splint.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forrest plot of grip strength using random effect model shows no significant difference between the 2 types of splints.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forrest plot of VAS scores using random effect model shows no significant difference between the 2 types of splints.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Forrest plot of pinch strength using random effect model shows no significant difference between the 2 types of splints.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Funnel plot of standard error by standard difference in means.

References

    1. Haara MM, Heliovaara M, Kroger H, Arokoski JP, Manninen P, Karkkainen A, et al. Osteoarthritis in the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb Prevalence and associations with disability and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(7):1452–7. - PubMed
    1. Fitzgerald BT, Hofmeister EP. Treatment of advanced carpometacarpal joint disease: trapeziectomy and hematoma arthroplasty. Hand Clin. 2008;24(3):271–6. - PubMed
    1. Ghavami A, Oishi SN. Thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis: treatment with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition arthroplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(6):116e–28e. - PubMed
    1. Valdes K, Marik T. A systematic review of conservative interventions for osteoarthritis of the hand. J Hand Ther. 2010;23(4):334–50. - PubMed
    1. Colditz JC. The biomechanics of a thumb carpometacarpal immobilization splint: design and fitting. J Hand Ther. 2000;13(3):228–35. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources