Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;6(1):15-22.
doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0122. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

Severity of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use Disorders Among Sexual Minority Individuals and Their "Not Sure" Counterparts

Affiliations

Severity of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Drug Use Disorders Among Sexual Minority Individuals and Their "Not Sure" Counterparts

Carol J Boyd et al. LGBT Health. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Sexual minority individuals have heightened risk for substance use; however, previous studies have not assessed severity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs), tobacco use disorders (TUDs), and drug use disorders (DUDs) among lesbian/gay and bisexual individuals and those "not sure" of their sexual identity compared with heterosexual individuals. This study examined how three dimensions of sexual orientation (identity, attraction, and behavior) relate to severity of AUD, TUD, and DUD.

Methods: This study used cross-sectional national data (N = 36,309) from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III, and well-validated alcohol, tobacco, and drug measures that align with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria. Data were collected through in-person interviews in 2012-2013.

Results: Sexual minority respondents, based on sexual identity, had higher odds of severe AUD or TUD than heterosexual respondents. Opposite- and same-sex behavior was a predictor of severe AUD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-4.79) and TUD (AOR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.19-3.93), but not DUD. Those "not sure" of their sexual identity had higher odds of severe AUD, TUD, and DUD: AUD (AOR = 5.05; 95% CI = 2.78-9.16), TUD (AOR = 4.18; 95% CI = 2.29-7.64), and DUD (AOR = 4.40; 95% CI = 1.72-11.2), than heterosexual respondents. There were few significant differences between "not sure" and bisexual respondents.

Conclusions: These findings provide strong evidence that bisexual and "not sure" U.S. adults are more likely to have a severe AUD and TUD. They also demonstrate the importance of treatment strategies that address sexual minority-specific risks, particularly for bisexual individuals and those "not sure" of their sexual identity.

Keywords: DSM-5 disorders; alcohol use; dimensions of sexual orientation; drug use; sexual orientation; tobacco use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

    1. Cochran SD, Mays VM: Estimating prevalence of mental and substance-use disorders among lesbians and gay men from existing national health data. In: Sexual Orientation and Mental Health: Examining Identity and Development in Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual People. Edited by Omoto AM, Kurtzman HS. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2006, pp 143–165
    1. Drabble L, Midanik LT, Trocki K: Reports of alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems among homosexual, bisexual and heterosexual respondents: Results from the 2000 National Alcohol Survey. J Stud Alcohol 2005;66:111–120 - PubMed
    1. Drabble L, Trocki KF, Hughes TL, et al. : Sexual orientation differences in the relationship between victimization and hazardous drinking among women in the National Alcohol Survey. Psychol Addict Behav 2013;27:639–648 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Green KE, Feinstein BA: Substance use in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: An update on empirical research and implications for treatment. Psychol Addict Behav 2012;26:265–278 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hughes TL, Eliason M: Substance use and abuse in lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender populations. J Prim Prev 2002;22:263–298

Publication types