Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2019 Jan;58(1):133-138.
doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.025.

Clinical outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies: A retrospective observational study

Affiliations
Free article
Observational Study

Clinical outcomes of multifetal pregnancy reduction in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies: A retrospective observational study

Yaqiong Liu et al. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To observe the pregnancy and perinatal outcomes of trichorionic triplet (TCT) and dichorionic triplet (DCT) pregnancies with or without multifetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR).

Materials and methods: This was a retrospective study of 732 TCT and 118 DCT pregnancies after IVF/ICSI cycles between October 1999 and May 2014 at the Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya. The TCT and DCT groups were subdivided into three subgroups: MFPR to single fetus group, MFPR to twins group and expectant group. Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes were compared between different subgroups.

Results: The resulting subgroups were TCT-Expectant (n = 40), TCT to twin (n = 610), TCT to single (n = 22), DCT-Expectant (n = 17), DCT to twin (n = 50), and DCT to single (n = 22). The groups with MFPR had the better pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. Meanwhile, the significantly higher abortion rates but lower live birth and take home baby rates were found in TCT-Expectant group and DCT-Expectant group (all P < 0.05). Besides, the abortion rate of DCT-Expectant group was much higher than TCT-Expectant group (41% verse 15%, P = 0.032). As for the perinatal outcomes, retaining single fetus group showed the advantage of higher birth weight, and elder gestational age in both DCT and TCT pregnancies (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: For DCT and TCT pregnancies, MFPR application could reduce the miscarriage rate, while improving live birth and take home baby rates compared to the expectant groups. Especially, when reduced to a single fetus, MFPR could provide the better perinatal outcomes.

Keywords: Dichorionic triplet pregnancies; MFPR; Perinatal outcomes; Pregnancy outcomes; Trichorionic triplet pregnancies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms