Biophysical Follow-up of Age-Group Swimmers During a Traditional Three-Peak Preparation Program
- PMID: 30640304
- DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002964
Biophysical Follow-up of Age-Group Swimmers During a Traditional Three-Peak Preparation Program
Abstract
Zacca, R, Azevedo, R, Ramos, VR, Abraldes, JA, Vilas-Boas, JP, Castro, FAdS, Pyne, DB, and Fernandes, RJ. Biophysical follow-up of age-group swimmers during a traditional three-peak preparation program. J Strength Cond Res 34(9): 2585-2595, 2020-The aim of this study was to quantify changes and contributions of bioenergetic, technique, and anthropometric profiles across a traditional 3-peak swimming season. Twenty-four age-group swimmers (11 boys: 15 years 6 months ± 1 year 1 month; 13 girls: 14 years 5 months ± 10 months) of equal maturational stage were monitored through a 400-m test in front crawl (T400). Bioenergetic, technique, and anthropometric characteristics were compared before and after macrocycles I, II and III. Sex interaction was verified only for amplitude of the fast oxygen uptake component and height (moderate). Multiple linear regressions and principal component analysis were used to identify the most influential variables and the relative contribution of each domain (bioenergetics, technique, and anthropometrics) to changes in swimming performance of T400. The relative contributions for the performance of T400 after macrocycles I, II, and III were, respectively, 6, 18, and 27% for bioenergetics, 88, 69, and 54% for technique, and 6, 13, and 20% for anthropometrics. Technique was the biggest contributor (71%) for changes in the performance of T400 over the training season, followed by bioenergetics (17%) and anthropometrics (12%). Technique played the main role during the competitive season, regardless of gradual increase in the contribution of bioenergetics and anthropometrics. Despite that, bioenergetics and technique are closely connected, thus a powerful and endurable metabolic base and cannot be overlooked. Changes and contribution of bioenergetics, technique, and anthropometrics on age-group swimmers' performance over a traditional 3-peak swimming season could be described by the T400 swimming test, providing a comprehensive biophysical overview of the main contributors to swimming performance.
References
-
- Ayabakan C, Akalin F, Mengutay S, Cotuk B, Odabas I, Ozuak A. Athlete's heart in prepubertal male swimmers. Cardiol Young 16: 61–66, 2006.
-
- Barbosa TM, Morais JE, Marques MC, Silva AJ, Marinho DA, Kee YH. Hydrodynamic profile of young swimmers: Changes over a competitive season. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25: e184–196, 2015.
-
- Capelli C. Physiological determinants of best performances in human locomotion. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80: 298–307, 1999.
-
- Costa MJ, Bragada JA, Marinho DA, Silva AJ, Barbosa TM. Longitudinal interventions in elite swimming: A systematic review based on energetics, biomechanics, and performance. J Strength Cond Res 26: 2006–2016, 2012.
-
- Costill DL, Kovaleski J, Porter D, Kirwan J, Fielding R, King D. Energy expenditure during front crawl swimming: Predicting success in middle-distance events. Int J Sports Med 6: 266–270, 1985.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous