Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):324-332.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6277.

Complication Rates and Downstream Medical Costs Associated With Invasive Diagnostic Procedures for Lung Abnormalities in the Community Setting

Affiliations

Complication Rates and Downstream Medical Costs Associated With Invasive Diagnostic Procedures for Lung Abnormalities in the Community Setting

Jinhai Huo et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Importance: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services added lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) as a Medicare preventive service benefit in 2015 following findings from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) that showed a 16% reduction in lung cancer mortality associated with LDCT. A challenge in developing and promoting a national lung cancer screening program is the high false-positive rate of LDCT because abnormal findings from thoracic imaging often trigger subsequent invasive diagnostic procedures and could lead to postprocedural complications.

Objective: To determine the complication rates and downstream medical costs associated with invasive diagnostic procedures performed for identification of lung abnormalities in the community setting.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective cohort study of non-protocol-driven community practices captured in MarketScan Commercial Claims & Encounters and Medicare supplemental databases was conducted. A nationally representative sample of 344 510 patients aged 55 to 77 years who underwent invasive diagnostic procedures between 2008 and 2013 was included.

Main outcomes and measures: One-year complication rates were calculated for 4 groups of invasive diagnostic procedures. The complication rates and costs were further stratified by age group.

Results: Of the 344 510 individuals aged 55 to 77 years included in the study, 174 702 comprised the study group (109 363 [62.6%] women) and 169 808 served as the control group (106 007 [62.4%] women). The estimated complication rate was 22.2% (95% CI, 21.7%-22.7%) for individuals in the young age group and 23.8% (95% CI, 23.0%-24.6%) for those in the Medicare group; the rates were approximately twice as high as those reported in the NLST (9.8% and 8.5%, respectively). The mean incremental complication costs were $6320 (95% CI, $5863-$6777) for minor complications to $56 845 (95% CI, $47 953-$65 737) for major complications.

Conclusions and relevance: The rates of complications after invasive diagnostic procedures were higher than the rates reported in clinical trials. Physicians and patients should be aware of the potential risks of subsequent adverse events and their high downstream costs in the shared decision-making process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Incremental Complication Rates From Invasive Diagnostic Procedures After False-Positive Screening Results
A, Incremental complication rates in the younger age group (55-64 years) and the Medicare age group (65-77 years), with the complication rates reported in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) for comparison. B, Incremental complication rates stratified by the procedure type, with the complication rates reported in the NLST for comparison.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Procedure Costs and Complication Costs
A, Procedure costs stratified by age group and invasive diagnostic procedure group. B, Complication costs stratified by age group and complication type.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, et al. . SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014.
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. ; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team . Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1102873 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinsky PF, Church TR, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS. The National Lung Screening Trial: results stratified by demographics, smoking history, and lung cancer histology. Cancer. 2013;119(22):3976-3983. doi:10.1002/cncr.28326 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wender R, Fontham ETH, Barrera E Jr, et al. . American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(2):107-117. doi:10.3322/caac.21172 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, et al. . Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(2):240-265. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2012.0022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types