Response by Claggett et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Comparison of Time-to-First Event and Recurrent-Event Methods in Randomized Clinical Trials"

Affiliations

¹ Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (B.C., M.A.P., S.D.S.).
² Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene, UK (S.P.).
³ Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (L.J.W.).
⁴ British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.).

Comment

Brian Claggett et al. Circulation. 2019.

. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):422-423.

doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038478.

¹ Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (B.C., M.A.P., S.D.S.).
² Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene, UK (S.P.).
³ Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA (L.J.W.).
⁴ British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, UK (J.J.V.M.).

No abstract available

Comment on

Comparison of Time-to-First Event and Recurrent-Event Methods in Randomized Clinical Trials.
Claggett B, Pocock S, Wei LJ, Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD. Claggett B, et al. Circulation. 2018 Aug 7;138(6):570-577. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033065. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 29588314
Letter by Boschetti et al Regarding Article, "Comparison of Time-to-First Event and Recurrent-Event Methods in Randomized Clinical Trials".
Boschetti E, Arrivi A, Pucci G. Boschetti E, et al. Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):420-421. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038044. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 30640542 No abstract available.