Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 11;16(2):194.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020194.

Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital

Marie Condon  1   2 , Edel Mannion  3 , D William Molloy  4 , Rónán O'Caoimh  5   6   7
Affiliations

Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital

Marie Condon et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Incontinence is common and associated with adverse outcomes. There are insufficient point prevalence data for incontinence in hospitals. We evaluated the prevalence of urinary (UI) and faecal incontinence (FI) and their predictors among inpatients in an acute university hospital on a single day. Continence status was recorded using the modified Barthel Index (BI). Baseline characteristics, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and ward type were recorded. In all, 435 patients were assessed, median age 72 ± 23 years and 53% were male. The median CFS score was 5 ± 3. The point prevalence of UI was 26% versus 11% for FI. While UI and FI increased with age, to 35.2% and 21.1% respectively for those ≥85, age was not an independent predictor. Incontinence also increased with frailty; CFS scores were independently associated with both UI (p = 0.006) and FI (p = 0.03), though baseline continence status was the strongest predictor. Patients on orthopaedic wards had the highest prevalence of incontinence. Continence assessments were available for only 11 (2%) patients. UI and FI are common conditions affecting inpatients; point prevalence increases with age and frailty status. Despite this, few patients receive comprehensive continence assessments. More awareness of its high prevalence is required to ensure incontinence is adequately managed in hospitals.

Keywords: faecal; hospital; incontinence; inpatient; prevalence; urinary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Point prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence overall and according to ward type in an Irish university hospital. FI: Faecal Incontinence, UI: Urinary Incontinence.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sanses T.V., Kudish B., Guralnik J.M. The relationship between urinary incontinence, mobility limitations, and disability in older women. Curr. Geriatr. Rep. 2017;6:74–80. doi: 10.1007/s13670-017-0202-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chong E., Chan M., Lim W.S., Ding Y.Y. Frailty predicts incident urinary incontinence among hospitalized older adults—A 1-year prospective cohort study. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2018;19:422–427. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.12.103. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molinuevo B., Batista-Miranda J.E. Under the tip of the iceberg: Psychological factors in incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn. 2012;31:669–671. doi: 10.1002/nau.21216. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fonda D., Nickless R., Roth R. A prospective study of the incidence of urinary incontinence in an acute care teaching hospital and its implications on future service development. Aust. Clin. Rev. 1988;8:102–107. - PubMed
    1. Wu J.M., Matthews C.A., Vaughan C.P., Markland A.D. Urinary, fecal, and dual incontinence in older U S. adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2015;63:947–953. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13385. - DOI - PMC - PubMed