Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):36.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2.

Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study

Christophe L Bertin et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Plain abdominal radiography (PAR) is routinely performed in emergency departments (EDs). This study aimed to (1) identify the indications for PAR in EDs and compare them against international guidelines, (2) uncover predictors of non-compliance with guidelines, and (3) describe the use of additional radiological examinations in EDs.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study in the EDs of two hospitals in Geneva, Switzerland, including all adult patients who underwent PAR in the EDs. Indications were considered "appropriate" if complying with guidelines. Predictors of non-compliance were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Over 1 year, PAR was performed in 1997 patients (2.2% of all admissions). Their mean age was 59.7 years, with 53.1% of female patients. The most common indications were constipation (30.8%), suspected ileus (28.9%), and abdominal pain (15.3%). According to the French and American guidelines, only 11.8% of the PARs were indicated, while 46.2% of them complied with the Australian and British guidelines. On multivariate analysis, admission to the private hospital ED (odds ratio [OR] 3.88, 95% CI 1.78-8.45), female gender (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.46-2.59), and an age > 65 years (OR 2.41, 95%CI 1.74-3.32) were associated with a higher risk of inappropriate PAR. Additional radiological examinations were performed in 73.7% of patients.

Conclusions: Most indications for PAR did not comply with guidelines and elderly women appeared particularly at risk of being exposed to inappropriate examination. PAR did not prevent the need for additional examinations. Local guidelines should be developed, and initiatives should be implemented to reduce unnecessary PARs.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier NCT02980081 .

Keywords: Abdomen; Emergency department; Plain X-ray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the research ethics committee of Geneva, Switzerland. Commission Cantonale d’Ethique de la Recherche (CCER) (identifier 2016–00104).

Data from this retrospective data were anonymized and manuscript does not contain data from any individual person. Therefore, the need for consent was deemed unnecessary according to CCER regulations.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mettler FA, Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog 1. Radiology. 2008;248:254–263. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kellow ZS, MacInnes M, Kurzencwyg D, Rawal S, Jaffer R, Kovacina B, et al. The role of abdominal radiography in the evaluation of the nontrauma emergency patient 1. Radiology. 2008;248:887–893. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071772. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morris-Stiff G, Stiff R, Morris-Stiff H. Abdominal radiograph requesting in the setting of acute abdominal pain: temporal trends and appropriateness of requesting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:270–274. doi: 10.1308/003588406X98586. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Randen A, Laméris W, Luitse JSK, Gorzeman M, Hesselink EJ, DEJGJ D, et al. The role of plain radiographs in patients with acute abdominal pain at the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29:582–9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jackson K, Taylor D, Judkins S. Emergency department abdominal x-rays have a poor diagnostic yield and their usefulness is questionable. Emerg Med J. 2011;28:745–749. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.094730. - DOI - PubMed

Associated data