Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 14;9(1):82.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36004-z.

Deducing Mucosal Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Anti-HIV Molecule Tenofovir from Measurements in Blood

Affiliations

Deducing Mucosal Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Anti-HIV Molecule Tenofovir from Measurements in Blood

Sachin Govil et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Microbicide pharmacokinetic (PK) studies typically sample drug in luminal fluid, mucosal tissue, and blood. Blood measurements can be conducted most frequently, serially within subjects. Antiretroviral drugs, however, act against HIV in mucosal tissue/cells. We computationally modeled the extent measurements in blood can predict concentrations in tissue, focusing on the antiretroviral drug tenofovir delivered by a vaginal gel. Deterministic PK models input host and product factors and output spatiotemporal drug concentrations in luminal fluid, epithelium, stroma/host cells, and blood. Pharmacodynamic (PD) analysis referenced stroma/host cell concentrations to prophylactic values; summary metrics were time from product insertion to protection (tlag) and degree of protection (PPmax). Results incorporated host factors characteristic of population variability. Neural nets (NN) linked simulated blood PK metrics (Cmax, tmax, AUC, C24) to mucosal PK/PD metrics. The NNs delivered high-performance mapping of these multiparametric relationships. Given multi-log variability typical of biopsy data for tenofovir and other topical microbicides, results suggest downstream but higher fidelity measurements in blood could help improve determination of PK and create inferences about PD. Analysis here is for a tenofovir gel, but this approach offers promise for application to other microbicide modalities and to topical drug delivery to vaginal mucosa more generally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structure of vaginal mucosa. Histology of the vaginal mucosa depicting epithelial and stromal layers (left). Schematic of model geometry depicting the gel layer above the mucosal surface (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Feedforward neural net architecture. Mapping Cmax, tmax, AUC, and C24 for TFV in blood (PK metrics) to Cmax, tmax, AUC, and C24 for TFV in stroma (PK metrics) and tlag and PPmax in stroma (PD metrics) using machine learning.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example PK curves of volume averaged concentrations in different compartments vs. time. Compartments are blood, gel, epithelium, and stroma. Tenofovir (TFV) is shown in all compartments and tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) is shown in the stroma, where it acts against target HIV-infectible cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sample effect of anatomical and physiological parameter variation on TFV PK metrics in blood. The variation involves epithelial thickness (hE), dilution rate in the gel (kD), and drug transport rate from the stroma to the blood (kB).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Example curve of the time history of the percent protected (PP) measure of mucosal protection by tenofovir diphosphate against HIV infection. The PP is the instantaneous fraction of stromal volume within which TFV-DP concentration is greater than or equal to a reference EC50 value. Here the reference EC50 is 224 ng/mL (500 fmol/mg).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Methodology process diagram. Schematic of steps in implementing neural net to predict mucosal PK metrics and, if data on drug potency are available, deduce resulting mucosal protection against infection (PD).

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Modeling HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis.
    Straubinger T, Kay K, Bies R. Straubinger T, et al. Front Pharmacol. 2020 Jan 31;10:1514. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01514. eCollection 2019. Front Pharmacol. 2020. PMID: 32082142 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Omar RF, Bergeron MG. The future of microbicides. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 2011;15:e656–660. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2011.05.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGowan I. An overview of antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis of HIV infection. American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y.: 1989) 2014;71:624–630. doi: 10.1111/aji.12225. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson AG, et al. Drug Delivery Strategies and Systems for HIV/AIDS Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and Treatment. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the Controlled Release Society. 2015;219:669–680. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.042. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benítez-Gutiérrez L, et al. Treatment and prevention of HIV infection with long-acting antiretrovirals. Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology. 2018;11:507–517. doi: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1453805. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baeten JM, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. The New England journal of medicine. 2012;367:399–410. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1108524. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types