Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 23:32:75.
doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.75. eCollection 2018.

Development and psychometrics of script concordance test (SCT) in midwifery

Somayeh Delavari  1   2 , Mitra Amini  3 , Zohreh Sohrabi  2   1 , Hamidreza Koohestani  4 , Sajad Delavari  5 , Rita Rezaee  3 , Elaheh Mohammadi  6 , Anne Demeester  7 , Bernard Charlin  8 , Masoomeh Kheirkha  9   2
Affiliations

Development and psychometrics of script concordance test (SCT) in midwifery

Somayeh Delavari et al. Med J Islam Repub Iran. .

Abstract

Background: Clinical reasoning plays an important role in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of diseases. Script Concordance test (SCT) is one of the tools that assess clinical reasoning skill. This study was conducted to determine the reliability and concurrent and predictive validity of SCT in assessing final lessons and gynecology exams of undergraduate midwifery students. Methods: At first, 20 clinical scenarios followed by 3 questions were designed by 2 experienced midwives. Then, after examining the content validity, 15 scenarios were selected. The test was used for 55 midwifery students. The correlation of SCT results with grade point average (GPA) was measured. To evaluate the concurrent validity of SCT, the correlation between SCT scores and the final exam of the gynecology course was measured. To measure predictive validity, the correlation of SCT scores with comprehensive exams of midwifery was calculated. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and coefficient Cronbach's alpha were used for analysis. The test's item difficulty level (IDL) and item discriminative index (IDI) were determined using Whitney and Sabers' method. Results: The internal reliability of the test (calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient) was 0.74. All questions were positively correlated with the total score. The highest correlation coefficient was related to GPA and comprehensive test with the score of 0.91. The correlation coefficient between SCT and the final test (concurrent validity) was 0.654, and the correlation coefficient between SCT and comprehensive test (predictive validity) was 0.721. The range of item discriminative index and item difficulty level in this exam was 0.39-0.59 and 0.32-0.66, respectively. Conclusion: SCT shows a relatively high internal validity and can predict the success rate of students in the comprehensive exams of midwifery. Also, it showed a high concurrent validity in the final test of gynecology course. This test could be a good alternative for formative and summative tests of clinical courses.

Keywords: Assessment; Clinical competence; Clinical decision-making; Clinical skill; Educational; Problem-solving.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Amini M, Moghadami M, Kojuri J, Abbasi H, Abadi AAD, Molaee NA. et al. An innovative method to assess clinical reasoning skills: Clinical reasoning tests in the second national medical science Olympiad in Iran. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4(1):1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schmidt HG, Mamede S. How to improve the teaching of clinical reasoning: a narrative review and a proposal. Med Educ. 2015;49(10):961–73. - PubMed
    1. Modi JN, Gupta P, Singh T. Teaching and assessing clinical reasoning skills. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(9):787–94. - PubMed
    1. Forsberg E, Ziegert K, Hult H, Fors U, editors. Assessing progression of clinical reasoning through Virtual Patients. Transforming Healthcare through Excellence in Assessment and Evaluation, 16th Ottawa Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, April 25-29, 2014; 2014.
    1. Zamani S, Amini M, Masoumi SZ, Delavari S, Namaki MJ, Kojuri J. The comparison of the key feature of clinical reasoning and multiple choice examinations in clinical decision makings ability. Biomed Res. 2017;28(3)

LinkOut - more resources