Intervention fidelity in postintensive care follow-up consultations at ten sites in the RAPIT-trial: A mixed-methods evaluation
- PMID: 30644124
- DOI: 10.1111/jan.13949
Intervention fidelity in postintensive care follow-up consultations at ten sites in the RAPIT-trial: A mixed-methods evaluation
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate intervention fidelity of nurses' delivery of the RAPIT recovery program for postintensive care patients.
Background: Interventions addressing patient problems after intensive care lack description of the process of delivery and the evidence of their effectiveness. This is needed to understand how these interventions work.
Design: Multistage intervention framework in a mixed-methods design. Intervention fidelity strategies were assessed for intervention design, training, delivery, receipt, and enactment with quantitative and qualitative methods inspired by the Medical Research Council and the National Institutes of Health Fidelity Framework.
Methods: Data collection was embedded in a multicenter randomized controlled trial to explore intervention fidelity of a recovery program (December 2012-February 2017). Ten Danish intensive care units participated in the RAPIT-trial including 386 patients and 27 nurses. Quantitative data covered training and delivery. Qualitative data explored design, quality of delivery, receipt, and enactment seen from nurses' and patients' perspectives. Data were analysed statistically and by systematic deductive-inductive thematic analysis.
Findings: A framework for participatory enactment of a complex intervention was developed and demonstrated delivery with high consistent fidelity across sites. Low delivery doses and variations were related to the program, patient, provider nurses and context.
Conclusion: Our study provides insight into the process of intervention fidelity of a nurse-led postintensive care recovery program and potentially enables professionals to understand key factors in cross-site implementation. Although we demonstrate consistent delivery and variations suggest that some patients may benefit more than others.
目的: 本研究的目的是评估护士对重症护理后患者实施RAPIT康复计划的干预保真度。 背景: 针对重症监护后患者问题的干预措施对实施过程的描述不足,实施有效性的证据也不足。而这是理解干预措施运行模式所必需的。 设计: 混合方法设计了多阶段干预框架。受医学研究委员会和美国国立卫生研究院保真框架的启发,采用定量和定性的方法对干预设计、培训、交付、接收和实施的干预保真策略进行了评估。 方法: 收集了多中心随机对照试验的数据,获取康复项目的干预保真度(2012年12月-2017年2月)。丹麦十个重症监护室参与了RAPIT试验,包括386名患者和27名护士。定量数据涵盖培训和交付两方面。定性数据从护士和病人的角度探讨了设计、交付质量、接收和实施。通过系统性演绎归纳主题分析,对数据进行了统计分析。 研究结果: 制定了一个复杂的干预措施参与性实施框架,各站点显示出的交付保真度高度一致。低交付剂量和变动与项目、患者、提供护士和环境有关。 结论: 研究对护士主导的重症护理康复项目的干预保真度过程提出了深刻见解,并能使专业人员了解跨现场实施的关键因素。 尽管展示的交付方式一致,但各种变动表明,一些患者可能比其他患者受益更多。.
Keywords: aftercare; ambulatory care facilities; complex interventions; empowerment; fidelity; implementation; intensive care unit; mixed methods; nursing; rehabilitation.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Stimulated by insight: Exploration of critical care nurses' experience of research participation in a recovery programme for intensive care survivors.J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1312-1322. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15193. Epub 2020 Feb 4. J Clin Nurs. 2020. PMID: 31971298
-
The creation of meaning - Intensive care nurses' experiences of conducting nurse-led follow-up on intensive care units.Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Aug;53:30-36. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 May 25. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2019. PMID: 31138490
-
A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study.Intensive Care Med. 2016 Nov;42(11):1733-1743. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1. Epub 2016 Sep 30. Intensive Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27695894 Clinical Trial.
-
Intervention fidelity in Qigong randomized controlled trials: A method review.Geriatr Nurs. 2019 Jan-Feb;40(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 6. Geriatr Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30093074 Review.
-
Integrative review of nurse-led follow-up after discharge from the ICU.J Clin Nurs. 2016 Jan;25(1-2):20-37. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12939. Epub 2015 Sep 30. J Clin Nurs. 2016. PMID: 26420520 Review.
Cited by
-
Factors to consider when designing post-hospital interventions to support critical illness recovery: Systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis.J Intensive Care Soc. 2025 Jan 3;26(1):80-95. doi: 10.1177/17511437241308674. eCollection 2025 Feb. J Intensive Care Soc. 2025. PMID: 39758281 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical