Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Apr;22(6):1125-1128.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980018003737. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

Front-of-pack nutrition labelling in the European region: identifying what works for governments and consumers

Affiliations
Review

Front-of-pack nutrition labelling in the European region: identifying what works for governments and consumers

Bridget Kelly et al. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The present commentary introduces a Health Evidence Network (HEN) report that synthesises evidence of front-of-pack food labelling (FOPL) policy development and implementation across the European Region.

Design: Countries were identified as having policies on interpretive FOPL from the WHO databases of Member State policies and online repositories of global food policies. For each identified country, evidence published from 1 January 1980 to 31 March 2018 was retrieved from peer-reviewed and grey literature. Extracted data were cross-checked with in-country representatives to ensure completeness and accuracy.

Setting: WHO European Region, spanning fifty-three countries.

Results: Fifteen countries had a government-endorsed policy on interpretive FOPL. Thirteen of these countries had introduced endorsement logos, while only three labelling systems provided an indicator for unhealthfulness. Common steps were identified in FOPL policy development, including: establishing FOPL as a nutrition policy priority; engaging stakeholders and the public; and collecting formative evidence on which to base the labelling system. Few countries had outlined formal provisions for evaluation of FOPL systems. The HEN report describes seven considerations for the adoption/review of FOPL policies to ensure these achieve the population nutrition aims of FOPL. These considerations relate to supporting consumer use and understanding of the labelling, policy feasibility and credibility, and ensuring policy implementation and accountability.

Conclusions: The HEN report encourages countries to consider FOPL policy that is applied widely across all products and provides negative evaluative judgements, possibly combined with positive indicators. Implementation provisions should drive widespread uptake of the system and allow for formal evaluation of impact.

Keywords: Europe; Front-of-pack; Label; Policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Monteiro CA, Moubarac J-C, Levy RB et al. (2018) Household availability of ultra-processed foods and obesity in nineteen European countries. Public Health Nutr 21, 18–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vandevijvere S, Mackenzie T & Mhurchu CN (2017) Indicators of the relative availability of healthy versus unhealthy foods in supermarkets: a validation study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14, 53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron A, Thornton L, McNaughton SA et al. (2013) Variation in supermarket exposure to energy-dense snack foods by socio-economic position. Public Health Nutr 16, 1178–1185. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Kleef E & Dagevos H (2015) The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labeling: a consumer perspective on key issues and controversies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 55, 291–303. - PubMed
    1. Grunert KG & Wills JM (2007) A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 15, 385–399.

Publication types