Inadvertent Migration of Umbilical Venous Catheters Often Leads to Malposition
- PMID: 30645997
- PMCID: PMC6518856
- DOI: 10.1159/000494369
Inadvertent Migration of Umbilical Venous Catheters Often Leads to Malposition
Abstract
Background: Migration of umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) has been described anecdotally.
Objectives: The aim of this paper was to investigate migration of UVCs using ultrasonography (US).
Methods: In a prospective observational study, the position of UVCs was determined using serial US within 24 h, at midweek, and at the end of the week after umbilical catheterization. Migration was recorded in distance and direction. Malposition was defined as a position of the UVC in the heart (right atrium or more distal along the UVC-route), umbilicoportal confluence, or in the umbilical vein. UVC position determined by US was compared with chest X-rays (CXRs) when these were performed for standard care within the same period of 1 h.
Results: Migration of UVCs was detected with US in 25/40 infants (63%) in 32 occasions, leading to malposition in 17/25 (68%) infants. UVCs migrated inwards in 18/32 (56%), leading to a position within the heart in 17/18 occasions. Most migrations occurred before Day 3 (21/32 [66%]). When a CXR was taken at the same time as US was performed (30 occasions), the assessment of the catheter-tip position differed in 23% of the occasions. When malposition was detected by US, this was detected on routinely performed CXRs in 11% of the occasions.
Conclusions: UVCs often migrate following insertion, often leading to malposition. Awareness for this is needed, and US is a feasible alternative for detecting malposition compared to CXRs and avoids additional radiation. Re-evaluation of the position of UVCs at least once, but within 24 h after placement, is recommended.
Keywords: Malposition; Migration; Umbilical venous catheters.
© 2019 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Adverse events associated with umbilical catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Perinatol. 2021 Oct;41(10):2505-2512. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01147-x. Epub 2021 Jul 16. J Perinatol. 2021. PMID: 34272469
-
Migration of Umbilical Venous Catheters.Am J Perinatol. 2019 Nov;36(13):1377-1381. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677016. Epub 2019 Jan 8. Am J Perinatol. 2019. PMID: 30620943
-
Ultrasound assessment of umbilical venous catheter migration in preterm infants: a prospective study.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017 May;102(3):F251-F255. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311202. Epub 2016 Oct 18. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017. PMID: 28424358
-
Revised formula to determine the insertion length of umbilical vein catheters.Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Aug;172(8):1011-5. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-1981-z. Epub 2013 Mar 16. Eur J Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23503982
-
A review of umbilical venous catheter-related complications at a tertiary neonatal unit in Singapore.Singapore Med J. 2021 Jan;62(1):29-33. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019140. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Singapore Med J. 2021. PMID: 33619572 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Adverse events associated with umbilical catheters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Perinatol. 2021 Oct;41(10):2505-2512. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01147-x. Epub 2021 Jul 16. J Perinatol. 2021. PMID: 34272469
-
Dwell time and bloodstream infection incidence of umbilical venous catheterization in China.Pediatr Investig. 2023 Oct 15;7(4):239-246. doi: 10.1002/ped4.12403. eCollection 2023 Dec. Pediatr Investig. 2023. PMID: 38050540 Free PMC article.
-
Study draft: "UVC-You Will See" study: longer vs. shorter umbilical venous catheter (UVC) dwell time (6-10 vs. 1-5 days) in very premature infants with birth weight < 1250 g and/or gestational age < 30 weeks.Wien Med Wochenschr. 2024 Sep;174(11-12):217-224. doi: 10.1007/s10354-024-01047-7. Epub 2024 Jun 13. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2024. PMID: 38869762 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Umbilical Venous Catheter Update: A Narrative Review Including Ultrasound and Training.Front Pediatr. 2022 Jan 31;9:774705. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.774705. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 35174113 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The neonatal DAV-expert algorithm: a GAVeCeLT/GAVePed consensus for the choice of the most appropriate venous access in newborns.Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;182(8):3385-3395. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04984-4. Epub 2023 May 17. Eur J Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 37195350
References
-
- Hogan MJ. Neonatal vascular catheters and their complications. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999 Nov;37((6)):1109–25. - PubMed
-
- Rand T, Kirchner L, Puig S, Ponhold W, Vergesslich K, Imhof H. [“Lines and tubes” in neonatal intensive care patients] Radiologe. 2000 Jan;40((1)):52–7. - PubMed
-
- Simanovsky N, Ofek-Shlomai N, Rozovsky K, Ergaz-Shaltiel Z, Hiller N, Bar-Oz B. Umbilical venous catheter position: evaluation by ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2011 Sep;21((9)):1882–6. - PubMed
-
- Hermansen MC, Hermansen MG. Intravascular catheter complications in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol. 2005 Mar;32((1)):141–56. - PubMed
-
- Anderson J, Leonard D, Braner DA, Lai S, Tegtmeyer K. Videos in clinical medicine. Umbilical vascular catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct;359((15)):e18. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources