Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180216.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0216.

Patterns of Immediate-Release and Extended-Release Opioid Analgesic Use in the Management of Chronic Pain, 2003-2014

Catherine S Hwang  1   2 , Elizabeth M Kang  2   3 , Yulan Ding  2 , Josephine Ocran-Appiah  2   4 , Jana K McAninch  2 , Judy A Staffa  2 , Cynthia J Kornegay  2 , Tamra E Meyer  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Patterns of Immediate-Release and Extended-Release Opioid Analgesic Use in the Management of Chronic Pain, 2003-2014

Catherine S Hwang et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Many stakeholders are working to improve the safe use of immediate-release (IR) and extended-release/long-acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics. However, little information exists regarding the relative use of these 2 formulations in chronic pain management.

Objectives: To describe the distribution of IR and ER/LA opioid analgesic therapy duration and examine adding and switching patterns among patients receiving long-term IR opioid analgesic therapy, defined as at least 90 consecutive days of IR formulation use.

Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective cohort study of 169 million individuals receiving opioid analgesics from across 90% of outpatient retail pharmacies in the United States from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2014, using the IQVIA Health Vector One: Data Extract Tool. Analyses were conducted from March 2015 to June 2017.

Exposures: Receipt of dispensed IR or ER/LA opioid analgesic prescription.

Main outcomes and measures: Distribution of therapy frequency and duration of IR and ER/LA opioid analgesic use, and annual proportions of patients receiving long-term IR opioid analgesic therapy who added an ER/LA formulation while continuing to use an IR formulation, switched to an ER/LA formulation, or continued receiving IR opioid analgesic therapy only.

Results: Among the 169 280 456 patients included in this analysis, 168 315 458 patients filled IR formulations and 10 216 570 patients filled ER/LA formulations. A similar percentage of women received ER/LA (55%) and IR (56%) formulations, although those receiving ER/LA formulations (72%) were more likely to be aged 45 years or older compared with those receiving IR formulations (46%). The longest opioid analgesic episode duration was 90 days or longer for 11 563 089 patients (7%) filling IR formulations and 3 103 777 patients (30%) filling ER/LA formulations. The median episode duration was 5 days (interquartile range, 3-10 days) for patients using IR formulations and 30 days (interquartile range, 21-74 days) for patients using ER/LA formulations. From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2014, a small and decreasing proportion of patients with long-term IR opioid analgesic therapy added (3.8% in 2003 to 1.8% in 2014) or switched to (1.0% in 2003 to 0.5% in 2014) an ER/LA formulation.

Conclusions and relevance: Most patients receiving opioid analgesics, whether for short or extended periods, use IR formulations. Once receiving long-term IR opioid analgesic therapy, patients are unlikely to add or switch to an ER/LA formulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Ms Kang is employed at Chiltern International Inc and Dr Ocran-Appiah is employed at GlaxoSmithKline. All contributions to the manuscript from both individuals occurred during their time at the US Food and Drug Administration and prior to their relationships with their current employers. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment in

References

    1. Campbell JN. APS 1995 presidential address: pain forum. J Pain. 1996;5:-. doi: 10.1016/S1082-3174(96)80076-6 - DOI
    1. Haddox JD, Joranson D, Angarola RT, et al. The use of opioids for the treatment of chronic pain: a consensus statement from the American Academy of Pain Medicine and the American Pain Society. Clin J Pain. 1997;13(1):6-8. - PubMed
    1. Chou R, Turner JA, Devine EB, et al. The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health pathways to prevention workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(4):276-286. - PubMed
    1. Von Korff M, Kolodny A, Deyo RA, Chou R. Long-term opioid therapy reconsidered. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(5):325-328. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greene K, Sharma I, LaBelle R, Greenblatt L, Daniel G, McClellan M Strategies for promoting the safe use and appropriate prescribing of prescription opioids: landscape analysis. https://custom.cvent.com/00BF8C9066844371A697530EA9BB54B7/files/970f3785.... Accessed February 17, 2018.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances