Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e182665.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2665.

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Care

Affiliations

Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Grading of Diabetic Retinopathy in Primary Care

Yogesan Kanagasingam et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: There has been wide interest in using artificial intelligence (AI)-based grading of retinal images to identify diabetic retinopathy, but such a system has never been deployed and evaluated in clinical practice.

Objective: To describe the performance of an AI system for diabetic retinopathy deployed in a primary care practice.

Design, setting, and participants: Diagnostic study of patients with diabetes seen at a primary care practice with 4 physicians in Western Australia between December 1, 2016, and May 31, 2017. A total of 193 patients consented for the study and had retinal photographs taken of their eyes. Three hundred eighty-six images were evaluated by both the AI-based system and an ophthalmologist.

Main outcomes and measures: Sensitivity and specificity of the AI system compared with the gold standard of ophthalmologist evaluation.

Results: Of the 193 patients (93 [48%] female; mean [SD] age, 55 [17] years [range, 18-87 years]), the AI system judged 17 as having diabetic retinopathy of sufficient severity to require referral. The system correctly identified 2 patients with true disease and misclassified 15 as having disease (false-positives). The resulting specificity was 92% (95% CI, 87%-96%), and the positive predictive value was 12% (95% CI, 8%-18%). Many false-positives were driven by inadequate image quality (eg, dirty lens) and sheen reflections.

Conclusions and relevance: The results demonstrate both the potential and the challenges of using AI systems to identify diabetic retinopathy in clinical practice. Key challenges include the low incidence rate of disease and the related high false-positive rate as well as poor image quality. Further evaluations of AI systems in primary care are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Kanagasingam reported a patent to Remote-I telemedicine system pending and licensed. Dr Xiao reported grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council during the conduct of the study. Mr Vignarajan reported grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang X, Saaddine JB, Chou C-F, et al. . Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United States, 2005-2008. JAMA. 2010;304(6):-. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kroenke K. Telemedicine screening for eye disease. JAMA. 2015;313(16):1666-1667. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.107 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Murchison AP, Hark L, Pizzi LT, et al. . Non-adherence to eye care in people with diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000333. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000333 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rosenberg JB, Tsui I. Screening for diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(16):1587-1588. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1701820 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Taylor CR, Merin LM, Salunga AM, et al. . Improving diabetic retinopathy screening ratios using telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging technology: the Vine Hill study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(3):574-578. doi:10.2337/dc06-1509 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types