Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184595.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4595.

Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators to Traveling to the Safest Hospitals in the United States for Complex Cancer Surgery

Benjamin J Resio  1 , Alexander S Chiu  1 , Jessica R Hoag  1 , Lawrence B Brown  2 , Marney White  2 , Audry Omar  3 , Andres Monsalve  1 , Andrew P Dhanasopon  1 , Justin D Blasberg  1 , Daniel J Boffa  1
Affiliations

Motivators, Barriers, and Facilitators to Traveling to the Safest Hospitals in the United States for Complex Cancer Surgery

Benjamin J Resio et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Directing patients to safer hospitals for complex cancer surgery (regionalization) may prevent thousands of mortalities in the United States.

Objective: To understand the potential for individuals to move to safer hospitals: what would inspire them to travel (motivators), what challenges would they face (barriers), and what would enable them to travel (facilitators).

Design, setting, and participants: This nationally representative online survey study asked respondents to consider complex cancer surgery at their local hospital or a hospital specializing in cancer an hour farther away. Completed surveys were weighted across sociodemographics to be nationally representative and outcomes were reported as weighted percentages. In January 2018, a panel of 1817 US adults recruited by address- and telephone-based sampling to be nationally representative were invited to take the survey. Data analysis was conducted from January 24, 2018, to September 19, 2018.

Main outcomes and measures: Proportion of respondents motivated to travel by specific quality and safety indicators (motivators), magnitude in difference that would be necessary, proportion facing specific barriers, and proportion enabled to move by facilitators. Resistant individuals were identified as people who would not travel except for the largest (top quartile) outcomes differences.

Results: There were 1016 completed surveys (response rate of 55.9%). The weighted median age was 48 years, 52% were female, median annual income was between $60 000 and $75 000, and 85% lived in a metropolitan area. Nonresponders were more likely than responders to be female, younger, nonwhite, less educated, and lower income (female: 54.4% vs 48.3%; P = .01; younger [aged <45 years]: 56.3% vs 37.1%; P < .001; nonwhite: 41.6% vs 30.0%; P < .001; less than college education: 43.8% vs 32.4%; P < .001; income <$30 000: 22.1% vs 17.1%; P = .01). Superior safety or oncologic outcomes, presented separately, motivated an average of 92% of respondents (95% CI, 90%-94%) to travel. One-third were easily motivated, requiring less than 1% advantage in safety or quality, while 12% were particularly resistant across outcomes. Respondents with lower income (income <$25 000: odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.19-3.39) and nonwhite race (odds ratio, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.05-2.42) were more resistant to travel. At least 1 barrier was identified by 74% of respondents (95% CI, 72%-77%), most commonly financial (costs/insurance). However, 94% of respondents (95% CI, 92%-96%) with barriers would travel if provided facilitators, many of which were relatively low cost (transportation, parking, and hotel).

Conclusions and relevance: It appears that most of the US public could be motivated to travel to safer hospitals for complex cancer surgery, yet most would require some support to move. Further efforts to ensure that benefits from regionalization are equitable across sociodemographic strata are indicated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Thresholds to Travel
A separate graph is shown for 4 of the 6 quality and safety indicators. Each bar represents the total percentage of who would travel at any given threshold (and therefore includes respondents who indicated a specific threshold or any smaller margin).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Barriers to Traveling to a Distant Specialty Hospital
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Impact of Facilitators on Respondents With Related Barriers
The percentage of restricted respondents who could travel to the specialty hospital if allocated the relevant resource or facilitator for free.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):-. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schlottmann F, Strassle PD, Charles AG, Patti MG. Esophageal cancer surgery: spontaneous centralization in the US contributed to reduce mortality without causing health disparities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(6):1580-1587. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6339-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Semel ME, Lipsitz SR, Funk LM, Bader AM, Weiser TG, Gawande AA. Rates and patterns of death after surgery in the United States, 1996 and 2006. Surgery. 2012;151(2):171-182. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Urbach DR. Pledging to eliminate low-volume surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1388-1390. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1508472 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiser TG, Semel ME, Simon AE, et al. In-hospital death following inpatient surgical procedures in the United States, 1996-2006. World J Surg. 2011;35(9):1950-1956. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1169-5 - DOI - PubMed