Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 31;25(1):123-128.
doi: 10.5056/jnm18035.

Functional Chronic Constipation: Rome III Criteria Versus Rome IV Criteria

Affiliations

Functional Chronic Constipation: Rome III Criteria Versus Rome IV Criteria

Marina Russo et al. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. .

Abstract

Background/aims: Functional constipation (FC) is aa frequent functional gastrointestinal disorder, diagnosed according to the Rome criteria. In this study, we compared Rome III and Rome IV criteria for the diagnosis of FC, and determined the prevalence of FC according to these criteria.

Methods: Consecutive children between infancy and 17 years old were recruited for the study, excluding those with a known organic gastrointestinal disease. A prospective longitudinal design has beenused. For the diagnosis of FC, questionnaires on Pediatric Gastrointestinal Symptoms (QPGS) based on the Rome III and Rome IV criteria (QPGS-RIII and QPGS-RIV) were used. The agreement between these 2 questionnaires was measured by Cohen's kappa coefficient.

Results: Two hundred fourteen children (mean age, 77.4 ± 59.5 months; 103 males) were screened. There was no statistically significant difference in the prevalence of FC evaluated using the QPGS-Rome IV vs the QPGS-Rome III in the overall sample (39/214 [18.2%] vs 37/214 [17.3.0%]; P = 0.831) as well as in any of the groups. The Cohen's kappa test showed a good agreement between the 2 criteria (κ = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.78).

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that the new Rome IV criteria have a good agreement with the Rome III criteria for the diagnosis of FC, without an increase in the number of potential diagnoses, despite the reduction in the duration of the symptoms. This conclusion is important in the management of childhood FC, since a late diagnosis negatively affects the prognosis.

Keywords: Functional constipation; Pediatric; Questionnaires.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: None.

References

    1. Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Prac Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;25:3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rajindrajith S, Devanarayana NM. Constipation in children: novel insight into epidemiology, pathophysiology and management. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2011;17:35–47. doi: 10.5056/jnm.2011.17.1.35. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malowitz S, Green M, Karpinski A, Rosenberg A, Hyman PE. Age of onset of functional constipation. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016;62:600–602. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bongers ME, van Dijk M, Benninga MA, Grootenhuis MA. Health related quality of life in children with constipation-associated fecal incontinence. J Pediatr. 2009;154:749–753. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.11.029. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chogle A, Saps M. Yield and cost of performing screening tests for constipation in children. Can J Gastroenterol. 2013;27:e35–e38. doi: 10.1155/2013/945165. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources