Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;24(2):1800204.
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.2.1800204.

Towards equity in immunisation

Affiliations

Towards equity in immunisation

Tammy Boyce et al. Euro Surveill. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

In the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region, differences in uptake rates of routine childhood immunisation persist within and among countries, with rates even falling in some areas. There has been a tendency among national programmes, policymakers and the media in recent years to attribute missed vaccinations to faltering demand or refusal among parents. However, evidence shows that the reasons for suboptimal coverage are multifactorial and include the social determinants of health. At the midpoint in the implementation of the European Vaccine Action Plan 2015-2020 (EVAP), national immunisation programmes should be aware that inequity may be a factor affecting their progress towards the EVAP immunisation targets. Social determinants of health, such as individual and household income and education, impact immunisation uptake as well as general health outcomes - even in high-income countries. One way to ensure optimal coverage is to make inequities in immunisation uptake visible by disaggregating immunisation coverage data and linking them with already available data sources of social determinants. This can serve as a starting point to identify and eliminate underlying structural causes of suboptimal uptake. The WHO Regional Office for Europe encourages countries to make the equitable delivery of vaccination a priority.

Keywords: Europe; epidemiology; immunisation; inequity; outbreaks; policy; public health policy; school outbreaks; social determinants of health; vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

References

    1. Crocker-Buque T, Edelstein M, Mounier-Jack S. Interventions to reduce inequalities in vaccine uptake in children and adolescents aged <19 years: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017;71(1):87-97. 10.1136/jech-2016-207572 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bocquier A, Ward J, Raude J, Peretti-Watel P, Verger P. Socioeconomic differences in childhood vaccination in developed countries: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2017;16(11):1107-18. 10.1080/14760584.2017.1381020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe). A report on the epidemiology of selected vaccine-preventable diseases in the European Region. WHO EpiBrief No. 2. Copenhagen: WHO/Europe; 2017. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/349062/EpiBrief_2_20...
    1. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe). European Vaccine Action Plan 2015–2020. Copenhagen: WHO/Europe; 2014. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/vaccines-and...
    1. Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE). SAGE assessment report 2016 – key messages. [Accessed 21 Dec 2017]. Available from: http://www.who.int/immunization/global_vaccine_action_plan/Key_messages_...