Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery
- PMID: 30647545
- PMCID: PMC6327746
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673353
Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) to Perform Clinical Research in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Abstract
The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (ACS-NSQIP) is probably the most well-known surgical database in North American and worldwide. This clinical database was first proposed by Dr. Clifford Ko, a colorectal surgeon, to the ACS, and NSQIP first started collecting data ca. 2005 with the intent of comparing hospitals (benchmarking) and for hospital-level quality improvement projects. Since then, its popularity has grown from just a few participating hospitals in the United States to more than 708 participating hospitals worldwide, and collaboration allows regional or disease-specific data sharing. Importantly, from a methodological perspective, as the number of hospitals has grown so has the hospital heterogeneity and thus generalizability of the results and conclusions of the individual studies. In this article, we will first briefly present the structure of the database (aka the Participant User File) and other important methodological considerations specific to performing clinical research. We will then briefly review and summarize the approximately 60 published colectomy articles and 30 published articles on proctectomy. We will conclude with future directions relevant to colorectal clinical research.
Keywords: American College of Surgeons; National Quality Improvement Program; biostatistics; clinical research; colectomy; data analysis; outcomes; proctectomy.
Figures



Similar articles
-
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: achieving better and safer surgery.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 May;41(5):199-204. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41026-8. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015. PMID: 25977246
-
Effects of Colorectal Surgery Classification on Reported Postoperative Surgical Site Infections.J Surg Res. 2019 Apr;236:340-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.12.005. Epub 2019 Jan 4. J Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 30694775
-
The role of Surgical Champions in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program--a national survey.J Surg Res. 2011 Mar;166(1):e15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.10.036. Epub 2010 Nov 25. J Surg Res. 2011. PMID: 21176914
-
Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach.Adv Surg. 2010;44:251-67. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2010.05.003. Adv Surg. 2010. PMID: 20919525 Review.
-
Reporting Methodology of Neurosurgical Studies Utilizing the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(1):46-60. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz180. Neurosurgery. 2020. PMID: 31225602
Cited by
-
Factors associated with 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery.Ann Saudi Med. 2023 Nov-Dec;43(6):364-372. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2023.364. Epub 2023 Dec 7. Ann Saudi Med. 2023. PMID: 38071441 Free PMC article.
-
Unplanned intubation after total hip and total knee arthroplasty: Assessing preoperative risk factors.J Orthop. 2022 Feb 3;29:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.01.011. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb. J Orthop. 2022. PMID: 35210717 Free PMC article.
-
Predicting Need for Skilled Nursing or Rehabilitation Facility after Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty.Hip Pelvis. 2022 Dec;34(4):227-235. doi: 10.5371/hp.2022.34.4.227. Epub 2022 Dec 3. Hip Pelvis. 2022. PMID: 36601616 Free PMC article.
-
Implementation of the Canadian National Standards in Breast Cancer Surgical Care: Gaps, Barriers, Enablers and Opportunities.Curr Oncol. 2021 Jan 19;28(1):565-573. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28010056. Curr Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33477965 Free PMC article.
-
National Databases for Assessment of Quality.Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023 Mar 13;36(4):252-258. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1761593. eCollection 2023 Jul. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023. PMID: 37223233 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Bilimoria K Y, Bentrem D J, Merkow R P et al.Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(11):2001–2009. - PubMed
-
- Ricciardi R, Roberts P L, Read T E, Hall J F, Marcello P W, Schoetz D J. Which adverse events are associated with mortality and prolonged length of stay following colorectal surgery? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(08):1485–1493. - PubMed
-
- Ingraham A M, Cohen M E, Bilimoria K Y et al.Comparison of hospital performance in nonemergency versus emergency colorectal operations at 142 hospitals. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(02):155–165. - PubMed
-
- Ballian N, Weisensel N, Rajamanickam V et al.Comparable postoperative morbidity and mortality after laparoscopic and open emergent restorative colectomy: outcomes from the ACS NSQIP. World J Surg. 2012;36(10):2488–2496. - PubMed
-
- Holubar S D, Brickman R K, Greaves S W, Ivatury S J. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy: a risk factor for short-term wound complications after radical resection for rectal cancer? J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(02):291–298. - PubMed