Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Jan;32(1):82-90.
doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1673358. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

Electronic Health Record-Based Registries: Clinical Research Using Registries in Colon and Rectal Surgery

Affiliations
Review

Electronic Health Record-Based Registries: Clinical Research Using Registries in Colon and Rectal Surgery

Jacob Carlson et al. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) or electronic medical records (EMRs) contain a vast amount of clinical data that can be useful for multiple purposes including research. Disease registries are collections of data in predefined formats for population management, research, and other purposes. There are differences between EHRs and registries in the data structure, data standards, and protocols. Proprietary EHR systems use different coding systems and data standards, which are usually kept secret. For EHR data to flow seamlessly into registries, there is the need for interoperability between EHR systems and between EHRs and registries. The levels of interoperability required include functional, structural, and semantic interoperability. EHR data can be manually mapped to registry data, but that is a tedious, resource-intensive endeavor. The development of data standards that can be used as building blocks for both EHRs and registries will help overcome the problem of interoperability.

Keywords: Electronic Health Records; clinical research; colorectal surgery; interoperability; outcomes; registries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Effect of trigger-based intervention on time to diagnostic evaluation for colorectal cancer. Description: The time to evaluation for patients who required diagnostic evaluation for colorectal cancer was significantly reduced by the implementation of EHR-based triggers that notified patients' respective primary care physician of this need. Reproduced with permission from Murphy et al.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Non-federal Acute Care Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology website:dashboard.healthit.gov/quickstats/pages/FIG-Hospital-EHR-Adoption.phpPublished May 2016Accessed September 6, 2016
    1. Gliklich R E, Dreyer N A, Leavy M D. Rockville, MD: AHRQ Publication; 2014. Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. 3rd ed., Vol. 1; p. 17. - PubMed
    1. How Cancer Registries Work. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website.http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/npcr/value/registries.htmUpdated October 19, 2015Accessed March 24, 2016
    1. The Cancer Registry and the Registrar.National Cancer Registrars Association website https://www.ncra-usa.org/files/public/CancerRegistryandRegistrarFactShee.... Accessed March 24, 2016
    1. Cancer Registry. Virginia Mason Medical Center website.https://www.virginiamason.org/cancerregistry. Accessed March 24, 2016