Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Dec;14(2):269-279.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

Cryoprotection of probiotic bacteria with poly-γ-glutamic acid produced by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis

Affiliations

Cryoprotection of probiotic bacteria with poly-γ-glutamic acid produced by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis

Eman Zakaria Gomaa. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2016 Dec.

Abstract

Poly-γ-glutamic acid (γ-PGA) is a naturally occurring biopolymer made up of repeating units of glutamic acid and can be potentially used for multiple applications. This study compared the production of γ-PGA by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis in GS and E media. The highest γ-PGA production was achieved using initial glycerol concentration of 40 and 80 g/l, ammonium chloride as the nitrogen source, 20 g/l glutamic acid at pH 6.5 for 72 h using E medium. On characterization, it was observed that glutamic acid was the sole component of the purified material. It contained a mixture of Na-γ-PGA and H+-γ-PGA. The survival of probiotics during freeze drying was improved by combining them with γ-PGA polymer. For Lactobacilli, 10% γ-PGA protected the cells significantly than 10% sucrose during freeze drying. γ-PGA protection was shown to improve the viability of probiotic bacteria in orange juice for 40 days. No considerable change was observed in the concentrations of citric acid, malic acid and ascorbic acid when probiotic bacteria and γ-PGA were introduced into orange juice and hence, it could be used as a non-dairy delivery platform for these bacteria.

Keywords: Cryoprotectant; Orange juice; Poly-γ-glutamic acid; Probiotics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of bacterial growth and yield of γ-PGA produced by Bacillus subtilis grown in GS and E medium. Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of bacterial growth and yield of γ-PGA produced by Bacillus licheniformis grown in GS and E medium. Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of different glycerol concentrations on growth and γ-PGA production by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis. Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of different glutamic acid concentrations on growth and γ-PGA production by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis. Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Effect of pH on growth and γ-PGA production by Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis. Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
FTIR spectrum of γ-PGA produced by Bacillus subtilis.
Figure 7
Figure 7
FTIR spectrum of γ-PGA produced by Bacillus licheniformis.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Viability of L. rhamnosus in orange juice (free cells and cells coated with γ-PGA produced by B. subtilis and B. licheniformis). Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Viability of L. paracasei in orange juice (free cells and cells coated with γ-PGA produced by B. subtilis and B. licheniformis). Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Viability of L. plantarum in orange juice (free cells and cells coated with γ-PGA produced by B. subtilis and B. licheniformis). Results are means of three independent determinations. Bars correspond to standard deviation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashiuchi M. In: Microbiology Monographs. Hamano Y., editor. Vol. 15. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; NewYork: 2010. pp. 77–93.
    1. Bajaj I., Singhal R. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:5551–5561. - PubMed
    1. Bhat A.R., Irorere V.U., Bartlett T., Hill D., Kedia G., Morris M.R., Charalampopoulos D., Radecka I. AMB Express. 2013;3:36–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burgain J., Gaiani C., Linder M., Scher J. J. Food Eng. 2011;104:467–483.
    1. Ding W., Shah N. Int. Food Res. J. 2008;15:219–232.

LinkOut - more resources