Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 15:7:1641.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16523.2. eCollection 2018.

Sharing health research data - the role of funders in improving the impact

Affiliations

Sharing health research data - the role of funders in improving the impact

Robert F Terry et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Recent public health emergencies with outbreaks of influenza, Ebola and Zika revealed that the mechanisms for sharing research data are neither being used, or adequate for the purpose, particularly where data needs to be shared rapidly. A review of research papers, including completed clinical trials related to priority pathogens, found only 31% (98 out of 319 published papers, excluding case studies) provided access to all the data underlying the paper - 65% of these papers give no information on how to find or access the data. Only two clinical trials out of 58 on interventions for WHO priority pathogens provided any link in their registry entry to the background data. Interviews with researchers revealed a reluctance to share data included a lack of confidence in the utility of the data; an absence of academic-incentives for rapid dissemination that prevents subsequent publication and a disconnect between those who are collecting the data and those who wish to use it quickly. The role of the funders of research needs to change to address this. Funders need to engage early with the researchers and related stakeholders to understand their concerns and work harder to define the more explicitly the benefits to all stakeholders. Secondly, there needs to be a direct benefit to sharing data that is directly relevant to those people that collect and curate the data. Thirdly more work needs to be done to realise the intent of making data sharing resources more equitable, ethical and efficient. Finally, a checklist of the issues that need to be addressed when designing new or revising existing data sharing resources should be created. This checklist would highlight the technical, cultural and ethical issues that need to be considered and point to examples of emerging good practice that can be used to address them.

Keywords: Health research; curation; data infrastructure; data sharing; data standards; pandemics; public health emergencies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.

Comment in

References

    1. Pisani E, Ghataure A, Merson L: Data sharing in public health emergencies: A study of current policies, practices and infrastructure supporting the sharing of data to prevent and respond to epidemic and pandemic threats. Wellcome Trust.2018. 10.6084/m9.figshare.5897608.v1 - DOI
    1. Pisani E, Ghataure A, Merson L: Supporting Data for: Data sharing in public health emergencies: A study of current policies, practices and infrastructure supporting the sharing of data to prevent and respond to epidemic and pandemic threats. Harvard Dataverse, V1.2017. 10.7910/DVN/D1HAPO - DOI
    1. Yozwiak NL, Schaffner SF, Sabeti PC: Data sharing: Make outbreak research open access. Nature. 2015;518(7540):477–9. 10.1038/518477a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pisani E, Aaby P, Breugelmans JG, et al. : Beyond open data: realising the health benefits of sharing data. BMJ. 2016;355:i5295. 10.1136/bmj.i5295 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olliaro PL: Initiation and publication time-lags of treatment trials for Ebola virus disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):28–29. 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30698-9 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources