Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Mar 1;37(7):559-569.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01010. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Prognosis: A Pooled Individual Patient Analysis of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancers

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Prognosis: A Pooled Individual Patient Analysis of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancers

Sherene Loi et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the current study was to conduct a pooled analysis of studies that have investigated the prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods: Participating studies had evaluated the percentage infiltration of stromally located TILs (sTILs) that were quantified in the same manner in patient diagnostic samples of early-stage TNBC treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy with or without taxanes. Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by trial were used for invasive disease-free survival (iDFS; primary end point), distant disease-free survival (D-DFS), and overall survival (OS), fitting sTILs as a continuous variable adjusted for clinicopathologic factors.

Results: We collected individual data from 2,148 patients from nine studies. Average age was 50 years (range, 22 to 85 years), and 33% of patients were node negative. The average value of sTILs was 23% (standard deviation, 20%), and 77% of patients had 1% or more sTILs. sTILs were significantly lower with older age ( P = .001), larger tumor size ( P = .01), more nodal involvement ( P = .02), and lower histologic grade ( P = .001). A total of 736 iDFS and 548 D-DFS events and 533 deaths were observed. In the multivariable model, sTILs added significant independent prognostic information for all end points (likelihood ratio χ2, 48.9 iDFS; P < .001; χ2, 55.8 D-DFS; P < .001; χ2, 48.5 OS; P < .001). Each 10% increment in sTILs corresponded to an iDFS hazard ratio of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.91) for iDFS, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88) for D-DFS, and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.89) for OS. In node-negative patients with sTILs ≥ 30%, 3-year iDFS was 92% (95% CI, 89% to 98%), D-DFS was 97% (95% CI, 95% to 99%), and OS was 99% (95% CI, 97% to 100%).

Conclusion: This pooled data analysis confirms the strong prognostic role of sTILs in early-stage TNBC and excellent survival of patients with high sTILs after adjuvant chemotherapy and supports the integration of sTILs in a clinicopathologic prognostic model for patients with TNBC. This model can be found at www.tilsinbreastcancer.org .

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Study flow chart. CP, clinicopathologic; IPD, individual participant data; iTILs, intratumoral tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TILs, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Forest plot of the prognostic effect of the stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) variable for each 10% increment on (A) invasive disease-free survival, (B) distant disease-free survival, and (C) overall survival. Hazard ratios (HR) are derived using Cox proportional hazards regression models and presented with 95% CIs. The size of the boxes is proportional to the inverse of the variance of the estimator in each study. Cochrane Q-like test (Q) and I2 statistics were used to evaluate between-study heterogeneity. BIG, Breast International Group; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FinHER, Finland Herceptin; GR, Gustave Roussy; IBCSG, International Breast Cancer Study Group; IEO, European Institute of Oncology; PACS, Protocole Adjuvant dans le Cancer du Sein.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), (B) distant disease-free survival (D-DFS), and (C) overall survival (OS) according to stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) dichotomized at the value of 30% in the entire population. Shaded areas correspond to pointwise 95% CIs. P values correspond to log-rank tests.
FIG 4.
FIG 4.
Kaplan-Meier curves of (A) invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), (B) distant disease-free survival (D-DFS), and (C) overall survival (OS) according to nodal status and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) dichotomized at the value of 30%. Shaded areas correspond to pointwise 95% CIs. P values correspond to log-rank tests. iDFS estimated 3-year survival for stromal TILs ≥ 30% v < 30% for node negative disease: 92% (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.96) v 88% (95% CI, 0.85 to 0.90); estimated 5-year survival: 88% (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.93) v 81% (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.84). D-DFS estimated 3-year survival for stromal TILs ≥ 30% v < 30% for node-negative disease: 97% (95% CI, 0.95 to 0.99) v 91% (95% CI, 0.88 to 0.83); estimated 5-year survival: 93% (95% CI, 0.89 to 0.96) v 87% (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.90). OS estimated 3-year survival for stromal TILs ≥ 30% v < 30% for node-negative disease: 99% (95% CI, 0.97 to 1.00) v 95% (95% CI, 0.93 to 0.97); estimated 5-year survival: 95% (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.98) v 90% (95% CI, 0.87 to 0.92).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Savas P, Salgado R, Denkert C, et al. Clinical relevance of host immunity in breast cancer: From TILs to the clinic. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016;13:228–241. - PubMed
    1. Denkert C, Wienert S, Poterie A, et al. Standardized evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: Results of the ring studies of the international immuno-oncology biomarker working group. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:1155–1164. - PubMed
    1. Salgado R, Denkert C, Demaria S, et al. The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: Recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:259–271. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Joint Committee on Cancer BreastinHortobagyi GN, Connolly JL, D’Orsi CJ.(eds)AJCC Cancer Staging Manual ed 8New York, NY: Springer; 2017
    1. Riley RD, Ensor J, Snell KI, et al. External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: Opportunities and challenges. BMJ. 2016;353:i3140. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms