Obtaining a second opinion is a neglected source of health care inequalities
- PMID: 30651143
- PMCID: PMC6335699
- DOI: 10.1186/s13584-019-0289-5
Obtaining a second opinion is a neglected source of health care inequalities
Abstract
Observational studies have detected discrepancies between two expert interpreters of imaging and histopathological studies. Furthermore, in a substantial proportion of patients, an independent second opinion disagreed with the first one. Therefore, it is widely accepted that patients have a right to obtain a second opinion and, in case of divergent opinions, to deliberate and choose the option that they believe is most consistent with their individual circumstances. However, doctors are less likely to inform old and poorly educated patients about the possibility of seeking a second opinion, and this may contribute to healthcare inequalities. Hence the importance of (a) promoting doctors' self-awareness of a possible tendency to discriminate against old and poorly educated patients, and (b) creating programs within the healthcare system that would help patients in seeking a second opinion, suggest specialists for the specific problem of the patient, and provide tools to reconcile between discrepant opinions.
Keywords: Doctor-patient communication; Health policy; Health seeking behaviors; Second opinion.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors’ information
Jochanan Benbassat was a staff physician at the department of Medicine at the Hadassah University Hospital between 1962 and 1992, and since 1983, Professor of Medicine and chair of Medical Education at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem. In 1992–1997, he was head of the department of Sociology of Health and chair of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine at the Faculty of Health Sciences in Beer-Sheva. Since 1998, he is a research associate at the Health Policy Research Program of the JDC Meyers-Brookdale Institute.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not Applicable.
Consent for publication
Not Applicable.
Competing interests
The author declares that he/she has no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Comment on
-
Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017 Dec 8;6(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13584-017-0191-y. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2017. PMID: 29221461 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wibmer A, Vargas HA, Donahue TF, Zheng J, Moskowitz C, Eastham J, Sala E, Hricak H. Diagnosis of extracapsular extension of prostate Cancer on prostate MRI: impact of second-opinion readings by subspecialized genitourinary oncologic radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:W73–W78. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13600. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hansen NL, Koo BC, Gallagher FA, Warren AY, Doble A, Gnanapragasam V, Bratt O, Kastner C, Barrett T. Comparison of initial and tertiary Centre second opinion reads of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate prior to repeat biopsy. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:2259–2266. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4635-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Sawan P, Rebeiz K, Schoder H, Batlevi C, Moskowitz A, Ulaner GA, Dunphy M, Mannelli L. Specialized second-opinion radiology review of PET/CT examinations for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma impacts patient care and management. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e9411. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009411. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
