Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 16;146(2):dev166454.
doi: 10.1242/dev.166454.

Hippo signaling promotes lung epithelial lineage commitment by curbing Fgf10 and β-catenin signaling

Affiliations

Hippo signaling promotes lung epithelial lineage commitment by curbing Fgf10 and β-catenin signaling

Thomas Volckaert et al. Development. .

Abstract

Organ growth and tissue homeostasis rely on the proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cell populations. In the developing lung, localized Fgf10 expression maintains distal Sox9-expressing epithelial progenitors and promotes basal cell differentiation in the cartilaginous airways. Mesenchymal Fgf10 expression is induced by Wnt signaling but inhibited by Shh signaling, and epithelial Fgf10 signaling activates β-catenin signaling. The Hippo pathway is a well-conserved signaling cascade that regulates organ size and stem/progenitor cell behavior. Here, we show that Hippo signaling promotes lineage commitment of lung epithelial progenitors by curbing Fgf10 and β-catenin signaling. Our findings show that both inactivation of the Hippo pathway (nuclear Yap) or ablation of Yap result in increased β-catenin and Fgf10 signaling, suggesting a cytoplasmic role for Yap in epithelial lineage commitment. We further demonstrate redundant and non-redundant functions for the two nuclear effectors of the Hippo pathway, Yap and Taz, during lung development.

Keywords: Differentiation; Fgf10; Fgfr2; Hippo; Ilk; Integrin; Lung; Progenitor; Yap; β-Catenin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Epithelial Ilk or Yap inactivation during early lung development activates Wnt7b-Fgf10 crosstalk and expands the distal Sox9pos epithelial progenitor population. (A) Immunostaining for Sox2 and Sox9, and Yap on E14.5 control Shh-Cre and Shh-Cre;Ilkf/f lungs. (B) In situ hybridization on E13.5 control Shh-Cre and Shh-Cre;Ilkf/f lungs. (C) qPCR analysis of E13.5 control Shh-Cre (n=12) and Shh-Cre;Ilkf/f (ILK KO) lungs (n=14). (D) qPCR of E13.5 control (n=12) and Shh-Cre;Yapf/f lungs (n=10). (E) Immunostaining for β-catenin on E14.5 control Shh-Cre and Shh-Cre;Yapf/f lungs. (F) Quantification of Sox9 and Sox2 expression domains on images represented in A and G (n=5 for each genotype). (G) Immunostaining for Sox9 and Sox9 on control Shh-Cre, Shh-Cre;Yapf/f and Shh-Cre;Yapf/+ lungs. Data are mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01; *P<0.05, as determined using a two-tailed t-test; n represents the number of biological replicates. Scale bars: 20 µm in E; 100 µm in A,G.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Epithelial Ilk activates the Hippo pathway during late lung development. (A-N) Immunostaining and quantification of pixel intensity for Ilk (A-C), merlin (D-F), phospho-Mst1/2 (G-I), Taz (J-L) and pYap (M-O) in E18.5 control (A,D,G,J,M) versus Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f (ILK KO) (B,E,H,K,N) airways. (C,F,I,O) Maximum intensity levels. (L) Total intensity per area normalized to control. Data are mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01; *P<0.05, as determined by a two-tailed t-test; n=6 biological replicates for each experimental group. Scale bar: 100 µm.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Inactivation of one copy of Yap and Taz simultaneously with both copies of Ilk partially rescues the Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f phenotype. (A-T) Immunostaining and quantification for Sftpc and RAGE (A-D), Scgb1a1 and CGRP (E-H), Scgb1a1 and β-tubulin (I-K), K5 and p63 (L-N), and Ilk and E-cadherin (O-T) in E18.5 control, Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f and Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f;Yapf/+;Tazf/+ lungs. n=6 for each experimental group. (U) qPCR analysis of E18.5 control (n=7), Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f (ILK KO) (n=6) and Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f;Yapf/+;Tazf/+ (ILK YAP TAZ rescue) (n=6) lungs. (D) Maximum intensity levels. Data are mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01; *P<0.05, as determined by a two-tailed t-test; n represents the number of biological replicates. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Fgf10 overexpression during late lung development phenocopies the Nkx2.1;Ilkf/f late lung phenotype, which itself can be rescued by blocking Fgf10 signaling. (A,B) Co-immunostaining for Fgf10LacZ (β-gal) and ADRP (adipose differentiation-related protein), a lipofibroblast marker, on E18.5 control Fgf10LacZ lungs (A) and Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f;Fgf10LacZ (B) lungs. (C) Quantification of the number of Fgf10+ cells per image in A,B. Ctrl, n=6; Ilk KO, n=5. **P<0.01. (D-X) Immunostaining for Sox9; Sftpc (AT2 cells and distal tip epithelial progenitor marker) and α-SMA (smooth muscle); Rage (AT1 cells); K5 and p63 (basal cells); or Scgb1a1 (club cells) and CGRP (neuroendocrine cells) on E18.5 control (D,H,L,P,T), Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f (E,I,M,Q,U), Rosa26-rtTa;Tet-Fgf10 lungs induced from E15.5 (F,J,N,R,V) and rescued Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f;Rosa26-rtTa;Tet-sFgfr2b (G,K,O,S,W) lungs induced from E15.5. In A,B,D-O, the boxed areas are shown at higher magnification in the insets. (X) qPCR analysis of E18.5 control, Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f (ILK KO), Nkx2.1-Cre;Ilkf/f;Rosa26-rtTa;Tet-sFgfr2b (ILK rescue) and Rosa26-rtTa;Tet-Fgf10 (Tet-Fgf10) lungs. n=6 for each experimental group. (Y) Quantification of number of K5posP63pos basal cells in P-S. n=6 for each experimental group. (Z) Quantification of normalized maximum Sox9 and Rage intensity in D-G and L-O, respectively, and total Sftpc intensity per area in H-K. n=6 for each experimental group. **P<0.01; *P<0.05, as determined by a two-tailed t-test; n represents the number of biological replicates. Data are mean±s.e.m. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Inactivating β-catenin rescues the cystic Nkx2.1-Cre;Yapf/f phenotype. (A-P) Immunostaining on E18.5 control, Nkx2.1-Cre;Yapf/f and Nkx2.1-Cre;Yapf/f;βcatf/f lungs for Sftpc and RAGE (A-F), Taz (G-J), Yap and β-catenin (K-M), and K5 and p63 (N-P). (Q) qPCR analysis of E18.5 control, Nkx2.1-Cre;Yapf/f (YAP KO) and Nkx2.1-Cre;Yapf/f;βcatf/f (YAP rescue) lungs. n=6 biological replicates for each experimental group. (J) Maximum intensity levels for Taz (n=6 biological replicates for each experimental group). Data are mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01; *P<0.05, as determined by a two-tailed t-test. Scale bars: 500 µm in A-C; 100 µm in D-I; 50 µm in K-P.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Taz promotes AT1 cell differentiation. (A-O) Immunostaining on P21 control, Nkx2.1-Cre;Tazf/f and Nkx2.1-Cre;Tazf/f;Yapf/+ lungs for Sftpc and RAGE (A-C), Sox9 (D-F), Acta2 (G-L), or Taz, Spc and Hopx (M-O). In A-F,M-O, the boxed areas are shown at higher magnification in the insets. J-K show the boxed areas in G-I, respectively. (P) qPCR analysis of P21 control, Nkx2.1-Cre;Tazf/f (Taz KO) and Nkx2.1-Cre;Tazf/f;Yapf/+ (Taz KO Yap het) lungs. Data are mean±s.e.m. **P<0.01; *P<0.05, as determined by a two-tailed t-test; n=6 biological replicates for each experimental group. Scale bars: 100 µm in A-F,J-O; 500 µm in G-I.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Hippo promotes lung epithelial lineage commitment by inhibiting Fgf10 and nuclear β-catenin. During the branching phase of lung development, which lasts until ∼E16, distal Sox9-positive epithelial progenitors give rise to Sox2-positive bronchial epithelial cells. Subsequently, lungs undergo an alveolar differentiation program during which Sox9-positive distal epithelial progenitors give rise to alveolar epithelial cells. Nuclear Yap (n-Yap) in the distal tip epithelium allows the nuclear localization of β-catenin, which induces Sox9. In addition, nuclear Yap, through β-catenin, drives Wnt7b expression, which acts on the distal mesenchyme to promote the release of Fgf10. Fgf10 in turn drives nuclear β-catenin in the distal tip epithelium, both of which induce Sox9. Cytoplasmic Yap (c-Yap) in the proximal epithelium promotes the degradation of β-catenin and blocks Fgf10 expression in the adjacent mesenchyme, thereby promoting differentiation of the distal tip epithelial progenitors.

References

    1. Abler L. L., Mansour S. L. and Sun X. (2009). Conditional gene inactivation reveals roles for Fgf10 and Fgfr2 in establishing a normal pattern of epithelial branching in the mouse lung. Dev. Dyn. 238, 1999-2013. 10.1002/dvdy.22032 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alanis D. M., Chang D. R., Akiyama H., Krasnow M. A. and Chen J. (2014). Two nested developmental waves demarcate a compartment boundary in the mouse lung. Nat. Commun. 5, 3923 10.1038/ncomms4923 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azzolin L., Zanconato F., Bresolin S., Forcato M., Basso G., Bicciato S., Cordenonsi M. and Piccolo S. (2012). Role of TAZ as mediator of Wnt signaling. Cell 151, 1443-1456. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.027 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Azzolin L., Panciera T., Soligo S., Enzo E., Bicciato S., Dupont S., Bresolin S., Frasson C., Basso G., Guzzardo V. et al. (2014). YAP/TAZ incorporation in the beta-catenin destruction complex orchestrates the Wnt response. Cell 158, 157-170. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bellusci S., Grindley J., Emoto H., Itoh N. and Hogan B. L. (1997). Fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) and branching morphogenesis in the embryonic mouse lung. Development 124, 4867. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms