Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Mar 28;57(4):e01996-18.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.01996-18. Print 2019 Apr.

Evaluation of the Performance of the Cobas CT/NG Test for Use on the Cobas 6800/8800 Systems for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Male and Female Urogenital Samples

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the Performance of the Cobas CT/NG Test for Use on the Cobas 6800/8800 Systems for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Male and Female Urogenital Samples

Barbara Van Der Pol et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

The clinical performance of the Cobas CT/NG assay on the Cobas 6800/8800 systems (Cobas) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae was established in a multisite, prospective collection study using male and female urogenital specimens; supportive data from archived specimens were also included. The results obtained with the Cobas assay were compared with the patient infected status derived from a combination of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved nucleic acid amplification tests to determine the sensitivity and specificity of detection from each sample type. The sensitivity of Cobas for the detection of C. trachomatis in female specimens was 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92.4% to 97.4%) for urine; 98.6% (95% CI, 95.2% to 99.6%) and 99.2% (95% CI, 95.4% to 99.9%) for clinician- and self-collected vaginal swab specimens, respectively; 93.3% (95% CI, 89.6% to 95.7%) for endocervical swabs; and 92.5% (95% CI, 88.7% to 95.1%) for cervical swab samples in PreservCyt. The specificity for the detection of C. trachomatis was ≥98.8% for all female sample types. Sensitivity and specificity estimates of Cobas for the detection of C. trachomatis in male urine samples were 100% (96.8% to 100.0%) and 99.7% (95% CI, 99.2% to 99.9%), respectively. The sensitivity of Cobas for the detection of N. gonorrhoeae in female specimens was 94.8% (95% CI, 89.6% to 97.4%) for urine; 100.0% (95% CI, 87.9% to 100.0%) and 100.0% (95% CI, 87.9% to 100.0%) for clinician- and self-collected vaginal swab specimens, respectively; 97.0% (95% CI, 91.5% to 99.0%) for endocervical swabs; and 96.6% (95% CI, 90.6% to 98.8%) for cervical samples in PreservCyt; the specificity for all female sample types was >99.0%. The sensitivity and specificity of Cobas for detecting N. gonorrhoeae in male urine were 100.0% (95% CI, 95.8% to 100.0%) and 99.5% (95% CI, 98.8% to 99.8%), respectively. Fully automated assays help fill the clinical need for a sensitive, high-throughput screening tool to aid public health efforts to control C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae infections.

Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; Cobas CT/NG assay; Neisseria gonorrhoeae; PCR; genital infection; molecular diagnostics; nucleic acid amplification test; sexually transmitted infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Patient disposition and specimen evaluability in the prospective population. a, reasons for exclusion included clinician decision (n = 3), the patient did not meet the eligibility criteria (n = 21), the patient was unwilling to provide informed consent (n = 37), pregnancy (n = 1), protocol deviation (n = 14), screen failure (n = 1), and withdrawal by the patient (n = 15); b, nonevaluable subjects were those without an assigned C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae patient infected status (PIS; n = 51) or invalid/failed Cobas test results (n = 1). c, patients were considered evaluable if they had both a designated C. trachomatis/N. gonorrhoeae PIS, based on the prespecified PIS algorithm, and valid Cobas results for at least one sample type; d, valid samples were those with valid Cobas results and were included in the analysis; samples with missing, invalid, or failed Cobas results were excluded from the analysis; e, prospectively enrolled women were randomly assigned to the clinician-collected (CC) or self-collected (SC) vaginal swab specimen group. CT, C. trachomatis; NG, N. gonorrhoeae.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Venn diagrams comparing C. trachomatis-positive results across NAATs with urine samples from women (A), vaginal swab samples (B), and urine samples from men (C).
FIG 3
FIG 3
Venn diagrams comparing N. gonorrhoeae-positive results across NAATs with urine samples from women (A), vaginal swab samples (B), and urine samples from men (C) (prospective population).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Newman L, Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Wijesooriya NS, Unemo M, Low N, Stevens G, Gottlieb S, Kiarie J, Temmerman M. 2015. Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PLoS One 10:e0143304. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143304. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2018. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2017. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA.
    1. Bebear C, de Barbeyrac B. 2009. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:4–10. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02647.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. 1999. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect 75:3–17. doi:10.1136/sti.75.1.3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holder NA. 2008. Gonococcal infections. Pediatr Rev 29:228–234. doi:10.1542/pir.29-7-228. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances