Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Sep 26;57(5):588-595.
doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2018-0179. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

Effectiveness of lumbar supports in low back functionality and disability in assembly-line workers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of lumbar supports in low back functionality and disability in assembly-line workers

Ana Vanessa Bataller-Cervero et al. Ind Health. .

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem in manufacturing workers. Several strategies have been proposed in order to reduce the pain and/or improve functionality. Among them, lumbar supports are a common solution prescribed for lumbar pain relief. Most of the studies in the literature only consider subjective sensations of the workers for evaluation assessment. This study applies biomechanical tests (a flexion-relaxation test and a functional movement evaluation test) to analyse the effectiveness of flexible lumbar supports in functionality and disability versus placebo intervention, consisting of kinesiotape placed on the low back without any stress. 28 workers participated in the study, randomised in control and intervention groups with a two months' intervention. None of the biomechanical tests showed statistical differences in between-groups pre-post changes. No benefits of wearing a flexible lumbar support during the workday have been found in these assembly-line workers versus placebo intervention.

Keywords: Flexible lumbar belt; Flexion-relaxation phenomenon; Functionality; Lumbar pain; Manufacturing workers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
a) EMG probes and reflective markers location for FRP. b) Reflective markers location for functional test in posterior frontal and sagittal planes.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
a) Kinesiotape placement. b) lumbar support.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Commission (2000) European Occupational Diseases Statistics (EODS)—Phase 1 methodology. Eurostat working papers. Population and social conditions 3/2000/E/No 19. Reference metadata on Occupational Diseases, Compiling Agency: Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat), Luxemburg.
    1. Wynne-Jones G, Cowen J, Jordan JL, Uthman O, Main CJ, Glozier N, van der Windt D. (2014) Absence from work and return to work in people with back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med 71, 448–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sterud T, Tynes T. (2013) Work-related psychosocial and mechanical risk factors for low back pain: a 3-year follow-up study of the general working population in Norway. Occup Environ Med 70, 296–302. - PubMed
    1. Driscoll T, Jacklyn G, Orchard J, Passmore E, Vos T, Freedman G, Lim S, Punnett L. (2014) The global burden of occupationally related low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 73, 975–81. - PubMed
    1. Bataller-Cervero AV, Cimarras-Otal C, Sanz-López F, Lacárcel-Tejero B, Alcázar-Crevillén A, Villalba Ruete JA. (2016) Musculoskeletal disorders assessment using sick-leaves registers in a manufacturing plant in Spain. Int J Ind Ergon 56, 124–9.

Publication types