Assessment of oral mucosal conditions among beedi workers residing in beedi workers colonies in Karnataka, India
- PMID: 30651670
- PMCID: PMC6306609
- DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_140_18
Assessment of oral mucosal conditions among beedi workers residing in beedi workers colonies in Karnataka, India
Abstract
Background and objectives: Beedi workers are an important part of our society. Due to their occupation of beedi making, they face different types of health hazards. This study was undertaken to assess the oral mucosal conditions among beedi workers residing in beedi workers' colonies in Karnataka.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was carried out among 700 beedi workers in the age group of 18-60 years residing in five beedi workers' colonies in Karnataka. The information was recorded regarding personal history by personal interview by the investigator. The clinical examination was done using WHO 1997 "Oral Health Assessment Form." Significance is assessed at 5% level of significance.
Results: It was found that 26.9% of study population had different oral mucosal lesions.
Interpretation and conclusion: The present study showed that oral mucosal conditions of beedi workers residing in beedi workers' colonies in Karnataka were relatively poor.
Keywords: Beedi workers; health hazards; occupation; oral mucosal conditions.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Sen V. Effect of working condition on health of beedi workers: A study of Sagar district of Madhya Pradesh. In: Ghosh A, editor. Environment, Drinking Water and Public Health Problems and Future Goals. Delhi: Daya Publishing House; 2007. p. 132.
-
- Reddy KS, Gupta PC. Report on Tobacco Control in India. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2004. p. 43.
-
- Gupta PC, Asma S. Bidi Smoking and Public Health. New Delhi: Ministry of Heath and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2008. p. 3. 4, 6,198.
-
- Petersen PE, Henmar P. Oral conditions among workers in the Danish granite industry. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1988;14:328–31. - PubMed