Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 4;6(1):30-39.
doi: 10.1002/ams2.374. eCollection 2019 Jan.

Association between lymphocyte count and neurological outcomes in post-cardiac arrest patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia

Affiliations

Association between lymphocyte count and neurological outcomes in post-cardiac arrest patients treated with mild therapeutic hypothermia

Hidemitsu Miyatake et al. Acute Med Surg. .

Abstract

Aim: To examine lymphocyte counts as a predictive prognostic marker in patients with coma after cardiac arrest.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients with coma after cardiac arrest admitted to the intensive care unit of Shiga University of Medical Science (Otsu, Japan). Lymphocyte counts were measured for 6 days from admission. Neurological outcome was assessed as favorable or unfavorable using cerebral performance categories. Associations between lymphocyte count and prognosis were investigated using multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Results: Forty-six patients were assessed from February 2012 to December 2016. Survivors had significantly higher lymphocyte counts than non-survivors on days 2 and 5. Multivariate analysis showed that lymphocyte count was not associated with 90-day mortality. Patients with favorable neurological outcome at discharge had significantly higher lymphocyte counts on days 2-6 than patients with unfavorable outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, including possible confounders, showed that lymphocyte counts on days 2-4 and 6 were associated with neurological outcome (day 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.97, P = 0.029; day 3: OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.47-0.98, P = 0.04; day 4: OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.16-1.00, P = 0.05; day 6: OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.48-0.99, P = 0.046). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated high accuracy for predicting neurological outcome for each lymphocyte count on days 2-6 using the area under the curve, day 4 values being most accurate (day 2: 0.776, day 3: 0.787, day 4: 0.909, day 5: 0.774, day 6: 0.839).

Conclusion: Lymphocyte counts on days 2-4 and 6 after cardiac arrest are associated with neurological outcome; counts on day 4 most accurately predict neurological outcome.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary arrest; lymphocyte; lymphopenia; prognosis; therapeutic hypothermia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of white blood cell count, C‐reactive protein levels, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores between survivor (solid line) and non‐survivor (broken line) outcome groups of Japanese patients with coma after cardiac arrest (n = 46). The values of each point are shown below the graphs. The average of survivors is shown in the upper line of values; the average of non‐survivors is shown in the lower line of values. Whiskers in the graphs indicate standard deviation. SOFA score excluded Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. *P < 0.05 compared with survivors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of white blood cell count, C‐reactive protein levels, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores between favorable (solid line) and unfavorable (broken line) neurological outcome groups of Japanese patients with coma after cardiac arrest (n = 46). The values of each point are shown below the graph. The average of patients with favorable neurological outcome is shown in the upper line of values; the average of patients with unfavorable neurological outcome is shown in the lower line of values. The whiskers indicate standard deviation. SOFA score excluded Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. *P < 0.05 compared with the favorable outcome group. CPC, cerebral performance category.

References

    1. Berdowski J, Berg RA, Tijssen JG, Koster RW. Global incidences of out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1479–87. - PubMed
    1. Nolan JP, Neumar RW, Adrie C et al Post‐cardiac arrest syndrome: epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment, and prognostication. A consensus statement from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2008; 118: 2452–83. - PubMed
    1. Vondrakova D, Kruger A, Janotka M. Association of neuron‐specific enolase values with outcomes in cardiac arrest survivors is dependent on the time of sample collection. Crit. Care 2017; 21: 172. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weiser C, Schwameis M, Sterz F et al Mortality in patients resuscitated from out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest based on automated blood cell count and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio at admission. Resuscitation 2017; 116: 49–55. - PubMed
    1. Baser K, Bas HD, Attaluri P, Rodrigues T, Nichols J, Nugen K. Changes in neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratios in postcardiac arrest patients treated with targeted temperature management. Anatol. J. Cardiol. 2017; 18: 215–22. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources