Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan;98(3):e13975.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013975.

Coverage rate of ADME genes from commercial sequencing arrays

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Coverage rate of ADME genes from commercial sequencing arrays

Nabil Zaid et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Pharmacogenomics offers remarkable potential for the rapid translation of discoveries into changes in clinical practice. In the present work, we are interested in evaluating the ability of commercially available genome-wide association sequencing chips to cover genes that have high pharmacogenomics potential.We used a set of 2794 variations within 369 absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination (ADME) genes of interest, as previously defined in collaboration with the Pharma ADME consortium. We have compared the Illumina TrueSeq and both Agilent SureSelect and HaloPlex sequencing technologies. We have developed Python scripts to evaluate the coverage for each of these products. In particular, we considered a specific list of 155 allelic variants in 34 genes which present high pharmacogenomics potential. Both the theoretical and practical coverage was assessed.Given the need to have a good coverage to establish confidently the functionality of an enzyme, the observed rates are unlikely to provide sufficient evidence for pharmacogenomics studies. We assessed the coverage using enrichment technology for exome sequencing using the Illumina Trueseq exome, Agilent SureSelectXT1 V4 and V5, and Haloplex exome, which offer a coverage of 96.12%, 91.61%, and 88.38%, respectively.Although pharmacogenomic advances had been limited in the past due in part to the lack of coverage of commercial genotyping chips, it is anticipated that future studies that make use of new sequencing technologies should offer a greater potential for discovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps of calculating the practical coverage.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the coverage for 3 sequencing platforms normalized at 42x.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Engels FK, Loos WJ, van der Bol JM, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring for the individualization of docetaxel dosing: a randomized pharmacokinetic study. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:353–62. - PubMed
    1. Tanaka N, Kurose T, Seino Y. Therapeutic inertia or individualization? Delay in clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Curr Med Res Opin 2016;32:1477–8. - PubMed
    1. Gamazon ER, Skol AD, Perera MA. The limits of genome-wide methods for pharmacogenomic testing. Pharmacogenet Genom 2012;22:261–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grossman I. ADME pharmacogenetics: current practices and future outlook. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2009;5:449–62. - PubMed
    1. Lubomirov R, di Iulio J, Fayet A, et al. ADME pharmacogenetics: investigation of the pharmacokinetics of the antiretroviral agent lopinavir coformulated with ritonavir. Pharmacogenet Genom 2010;20:217–30. - PubMed

Publication types